Technological Lock-In: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created Page + Added Basic Sections/Info) |
(Added some more links under the "External Links" section) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
=External Links= | =External Links= | ||
* | *[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PL32ea0MqM A Video by the Youtube Channel "Real Engineering" on a company developing a "Liquid Metal Battery" that spends a large ammount of time explaining the issue of technological lock-in] |
Revision as of 20:42, 31 December 2020
Basics
- A characteristic pattern in the history of technology in which one “dominant design” drives out alternatives that would perform the same function.
- To a certain extent is beneficial as it controls Project Creep in development of solutions
- On a broader extent however, it makes the "Dominant Design" often the only profitable solution, due to economies of scale, despite sometimes being less efficient / optimal
- An example is the usage of lithium ion batteries for stationary power storage
- They are optimized to be lightweight and energy dense
- The lightweight advantage doesn't matter in stationary situations, thus the main advantage is lost
- Due to mass production for mobile electronics, they are cheaper that alternatives, despite many issues such as, Thermal Runaway , not scaling well, hazards in production/decomissioning, and raw material supply
- The solution seems to be finding a niche, then expanding from there
- For instance lithium ion batteries started out specifically for handheld electronics, far before being viable for BEVs