Nickel-Iron Battery/User Reviews: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Batteries still need to be developed, they are the holy grail [https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6853249] | *Batteries still need to be developed, they are the holy grail [https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6853249] | ||
*Fast nickel iron proven in lab - [https://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/june/ultrafast-edison-battery-062612.html | *Fast nickel iron proven in lab - [https://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/june/ultrafast-edison-battery-062612.html | ||
*Useful review- [I'm happy enough, spent the $$$ already, and re-rejuvenated the electrolyte this last summer, still going and I never worry about sulfation destroying them in a week. But they are inefficient thirsty bastards - [https://www.solarpaneltalk.com/forum/off-grid-solar/batteries-energy-storage/ni/3211-nickel-iron-vs-lead-acid-off-grid-battery-debate/page21] | |||
* |
Revision as of 03:31, 28 February 2021
Truth About Batteries
- Batteries still need to be developed, they are the holy grail [1]
- Fast nickel iron proven in lab - [https://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/june/ultrafast-edison-battery-062612.html
- Useful review- [I'm happy enough, spent the $$$ already, and re-rejuvenated the electrolyte this last summer, still going and I never worry about sulfation destroying them in a week. But they are inefficient thirsty bastards - [2]