OSE Unique Value Proposition: Difference between revisions
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
				
		
		
	
No edit summary  | 
				No edit summary  | 
				||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Nobody else in the world designs core infrastructure products openly, refines production engineering, publishes open Enterprise for core technologies used to drive a modern standard of living, and teaches entrepreneurs how to do this in a disciplined way. And publishes all the blueprints and Enterprise plans on the internet for free.  | *Nobody else in the world designs core infrastructure products openly, refines production engineering, publishes open Enterprise for core technologies used to drive a modern standard of living, and teaches entrepreneurs how to do this in a disciplined way. And publishes all the blueprints and Enterprise plans on the internet for free.  | ||
*There is a close contender - [[Precious Plastic]], for recycling plastic, though it  | *There is a close contender - [[Precious Plastic]], for recycling plastic, though it is a craft enterprise as opposed to a core infrastructure production enterprise.  Its scalability thus appears limited in terms of ral volume processed.   | ||
**It's machines are good, though not scalable like OSE machines (to 200 hp)  | **It's machines are good, though not scalable like OSE machines (to 200 hp)  | ||
**Its blueprints are decent, but not produced in freeCAD though they are exported as the universal STEP format.  | **Its blueprints are decent, but not produced in freeCAD though they are exported as the universal STEP format.  | ||
Revision as of 23:50, 15 July 2023
- Nobody else in the world designs core infrastructure products openly, refines production engineering, publishes open Enterprise for core technologies used to drive a modern standard of living, and teaches entrepreneurs how to do this in a disciplined way. And publishes all the blueprints and Enterprise plans on the internet for free.
 - There is a close contender - Precious Plastic, for recycling plastic, though it is a craft enterprise as opposed to a core infrastructure production enterprise.  Its scalability thus appears limited in terms of ral volume processed.
- It's machines are good, though not scalable like OSE machines (to 200 hp)
 - Its blueprints are decent, but not produced in freeCAD though they are exported as the universal STEP format.
 - Its core Enterprise models revolve around decorative plastic goods so far, as opposed to core infrastructure technologies. Moreover, PP does not propose a specific Enterprise concept - just generic possibility - limiting replicability significantly.
 - PP does not robustify its production engineering (industrial or personal applications) for machine build optimization like we do to make enterprise applications wide in scope
 - OSE has a formal apprenticeship program and mentorship around machine design and enterprise scaling.
 - Some of its best operations are subsidized (plastic goods at a resort) - as opposed to competing in the open marketplace - which limits scalability significantly.