OSE Fellowship Model: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The Thiel Fellowship is an inspiring idea, albeit in the broad sense. it affords further concentration of power, as opposed to its fundamental distribution. A Distributi...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [[Thiel Fellowship]] is an inspiring idea, albeit in the broad sense. it affords further concentration of power, as opposed to its fundamental distribution. A [[Distributive]] version would be accessible, based on a requirement to share knowhow openly. Further, it must be low cost. But is not 'an exclusive Fellowship for the Common Man' as OSE proposes a fundamental contradiction in terms? | The [[Thiel Fellowship]] is an inspiring idea, albeit in the broad sense. it affords further concentration of power, as opposed to its fundamental distribution. A [[Distributive]] version would be accessible, based on a requirement to share knowhow openly. Further, it must be low cost. But is not 'an exclusive Fellowship for the Common Man' as OSE proposes a fundamental contradiction in terms? Let's design this contradiction out. | ||
Revision as of 21:07, 18 February 2024
The Thiel Fellowship is an inspiring idea, albeit in the broad sense. it affords further concentration of power, as opposed to its fundamental distribution. A Distributive version would be accessible, based on a requirement to share knowhow openly. Further, it must be low cost. But is not 'an exclusive Fellowship for the Common Man' as OSE proposes a fundamental contradiction in terms? Let's design this contradiction out.