Air Motor: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
*30 CFM to 1 hp [https://fawcettco.com/drum-mixers/]
*30 CFM to 1 hp [https://fawcettco.com/drum-mixers/]
*28 cfm/hp [https://www.airbestpractices.com/system-assessments/compressor-controls/small-piston-air-motors-save-big-energy-while-ensuring-safety]
*28 cfm/hp [https://www.airbestpractices.com/system-assessments/compressor-controls/small-piston-air-motors-save-big-energy-while-ensuring-safety]
*1/2 hp specs - [https://21306865.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/21306865/DS0%20619-4%20(.50%20hp%206%20Cylinder%20Air%20Motor%20-%202019).pdf]. 1.4 cfm @90 PSI with 200 rpm.

Revision as of 18:04, 13 May 2025

  • 60% efficient, Livermore [1]. Implies standard air motors are 10-20% efficient. But even with that - that is good.
  • Compressor efficiency calculation, hard core - [2]
  • Compressors are 60% efficiency and up [3]
  • Anecdotal - 7% efficient [4]
  • 1/2 to 2 hp drum mixers [5]
  • 30 CFM to 1 hp [6]
  • 28 cfm/hp [7]
  • 1/2 hp specs - [8]. 1.4 cfm @90 PSI with 200 rpm.