Existential Hope: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wKinrEZykU4?si=kz-Bm3vXOvwC8Orz" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></html> | <html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wKinrEZykU4?si=kz-Bm3vXOvwC8Orz" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></html> | ||
Existential hope is a thing. Foresight Institute (https://foresight.org/technologies/ | Existential hope is a thing. Foresight Institute (https://foresight.org/technologies/foresight-existential-hope/) is working on it. Foresight is a sensemaking, futurist, mid-course correction, appropriate technology, metacrisis, existentical hope institution. Check out discussion with Beatrice Erkers - https://www.existentialhope.com/team/beatrice-erkers. They have a Fellowship that covers Existential Hope, and Open Source Ecology work may fit in that paradigm. Check out their library - "From Existential Angst to Existential Hope" - https://www.existentialhope.com/existential-risk-existential-hope. And "Meta-Tools for Progress" - https://www.existentialhope.com/meta-tools-for-progress-intro. Definitely big picture thinking. | ||
The OSE opinion is that social technology is more important. At a time of exploding hardware tech and retarded social tech - namely the lack of a collaborative abundance mindset - the key threat to society is not technology but humanity's incapacity to steward this technology properly. Stewarding technology properly is more of a personal development issue, less of a technology issue. | The OSE opinion is that social technology is more important. At a time of exploding hardware tech and retarded social tech - namely the lack of a collaborative abundance mindset - the key threat to society is not technology but humanity's incapacity to steward this technology properly. Stewarding technology properly is more of a personal development issue, less of a technology issue. | ||
Revision as of 16:07, 21 May 2025
Existential hope is a thing. Foresight Institute (https://foresight.org/technologies/foresight-existential-hope/) is working on it. Foresight is a sensemaking, futurist, mid-course correction, appropriate technology, metacrisis, existentical hope institution. Check out discussion with Beatrice Erkers - https://www.existentialhope.com/team/beatrice-erkers. They have a Fellowship that covers Existential Hope, and Open Source Ecology work may fit in that paradigm. Check out their library - "From Existential Angst to Existential Hope" - https://www.existentialhope.com/existential-risk-existential-hope. And "Meta-Tools for Progress" - https://www.existentialhope.com/meta-tools-for-progress-intro. Definitely big picture thinking.
The OSE opinion is that social technology is more important. At a time of exploding hardware tech and retarded social tech - namely the lack of a collaborative abundance mindset - the key threat to society is not technology but humanity's incapacity to steward this technology properly. Stewarding technology properly is more of a personal development issue, less of a technology issue.