Operational Prometheanism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "= Operational Prometheanism = '''Operational Prometheanism''' is a civilizational design stance that reconciles technological agency with existential risk awareness. Humanity is acquiring godlike powers. Godlike powers do not guarantee godlike outcomes. The future is determined by whether we build civilizations worthy of the power we wield. Bostrom maps the failure modes of godhood. This view insists that godhood implies responsibility for outcomes. Together, the...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The future is determined by whether we build civilizations worthy of the power we wield. | The future is determined by whether we build civilizations worthy of the power we wield. | ||
Bostrom maps the failure modes of godhood. | [[Bostrom]] maps the failure modes of godhood. | ||
This view insists that godhood implies responsibility for outcomes. | This view insists that godhood implies responsibility for outcomes. | ||
Together, the future is designed under existential constraints. | Together, the future is designed under existential constraints. | ||
Revision as of 07:13, 21 February 2026
Operational Prometheanism
Operational Prometheanism is a civilizational design stance that reconciles technological agency with existential risk awareness.
Humanity is acquiring godlike powers.
Godlike powers do not guarantee godlike outcomes.
The future is determined by whether we build civilizations worthy of the power we wield.
Bostrom maps the failure modes of godhood.
This view insists that godhood implies responsibility for outcomes.
Together, the future is designed under existential constraints.