First Principle Build Analysis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
#Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures | #Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures | ||
'''The critical element of interest is procedural information''' - which enable any novice to approach the build speed of professionals with only a bit of practice. In fact, an instructional/blueprint enabled novice can easily outperform a 'seasoned professional' without such build procedures | '''The critical element of interest is procedural information''' - which enable any novice to approach the build speed of professionals with only a bit of practice. In fact, an instructional/blueprint enabled novice can easily outperform a 'seasoned professional' without such build procedures - who would need to spend time deriving their own procedures. This is how it is normally done, and works well for obvious design - but fails at anything more complex where thinking is required. | ||
Revision as of 17:00, 12 May 2026
Using First Principles Thinking to derive build procedures from existing CAD design files.
There are many things that are already implicit in building:
- Materials are used
- Fasteners are used
- Existing build techniques
- OSE-specific techniques
- Machines, materials, and tools - and properties of each
- Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures
The critical element of interest is procedural information - which enable any novice to approach the build speed of professionals with only a bit of practice. In fact, an instructional/blueprint enabled novice can easily outperform a 'seasoned professional' without such build procedures - who would need to spend time deriving their own procedures. This is how it is normally done, and works well for obvious design - but fails at anything more complex where thinking is required.