Talk:Edison Battery: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ron Broberg (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(adding link to LA Times article today on Edison battery research @ Stanford) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Thanks. Long way to go before electric generation and storage looks as good as your Steam Engine index. [[User:Ron Broberg|Ron Broberg]] 12 July 2011 | Thanks. Long way to go before electric generation and storage looks as good as your Steam Engine index. [[User:Ron Broberg|Ron Broberg]] 12 July 2011 | ||
Too busy at present with my own nutty off-grid energy project to integrate this properly, but perhaps someone working in this specific area will find this useful (Today's LA Times): '''Stanford researchers update safer, cheaper Edison battery''' [http://www.latimes.com/news/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-edison-battery-20120626,0,6960650.story]. [[User:Duff|Duff]] 09:40, 27 June 2012 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:40, 27 June 2012
Good work here. This is the kind of background information we need to make progress on the NiFe and related battery systems. Mjn 08:44, 12 July 2011 (PDT)
Thanks. Long way to go before electric generation and storage looks as good as your Steam Engine index. Ron Broberg 12 July 2011
Too busy at present with my own nutty off-grid energy project to integrate this properly, but perhaps someone working in this specific area will find this useful (Today's LA Times): Stanford researchers update safer, cheaper Edison battery [1]. Duff 09:40, 27 June 2012 (CEST)