Open Source Ecology Paradigm: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="LibreOffice 3.3  (Unix)">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="LibreOffice 3.3  (Unix)">
<META NAME="AUTHOR" CONTENT="Marcin ">
<META NAME="AUTHOR" CONTENT="Marcin ">
<META NAME="CREATED" CONTENT="20111223;17353600">
<META NAME="CREATED" CONTENT="20111226;303700">
<META NAME="CHANGEDBY" CONTENT="Marcin ">
<META NAME="CHANGEDBY" CONTENT="Marcin ">
<META NAME="CHANGED" CONTENT="20111224;19231300">
<META NAME="CHANGED" CONTENT="20111226;310300">
<STYLE TYPE="text/css">
<STYLE TYPE="text/css">
<!--
<!--
Line 22: Line 22:
Jakubowski, Ph.D., 12.24.2011</FONT></FONT></P>
Jakubowski, Ph.D., 12.24.2011</FONT></FONT></P>
<P ALIGN=CENTER STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-weight: normal"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=2 STYLE="font-size: 9pt">part
<P ALIGN=CENTER STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-weight: normal"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=2 STYLE="font-size: 9pt">part
of the OSE Christmas Gift to the World</FONT></FONT></P>
of the OSE Christmas Gift to the World of 2011</FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
</P>
Line 37: Line 37:
to create the open source economy. The movement consists of hundreds
to create the open source economy. The movement consists of hundreds
of entrepreneurs, producers, engineers, makers, and supporters around
of entrepreneurs, producers, engineers, makers, and supporters around
the world who believe in the power of </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><I>open</I></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000">
the world – who believe in the power of </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><I>open</I></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000">
who share the </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><I>open</I></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000">
– who share the </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><I>open</I></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000">
ethic.  The 'Ecology' in the name refers to the interaction of
ethic.  The 'Ecology' in the name refers to the interaction of
natural and human ecosystems the environmental, societal, and
natural and human ecosystems – the environmental, societal, and
technological systems as they interact along </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><I>open</I></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000">
technological systems – as they interact along </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><I>open</I></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000">
principles.  Read a further description of the OSE concept as it was
principles.  Read a further description of the OSE concept as it was
formulated initially in 2003 (see Appendix). Since then, the concept
formulated initially in 2003 (see Appendix). Since then, the concept
Line 49: Line 49:
around open access to efficient production as a means to transcend
around open access to efficient production as a means to transcend
artificial material scarcity. The paradigm uses open source tools and
artificial material scarcity. The paradigm uses open source tools and
techniques to produce advanced civilization by unleashing the
techniques to produce advanced civilization – by unleashing the
power of the </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><I>responsible</I></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000">
power of the </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><I>responsible</I></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000">
use of technology.</FONT></P>
use of technology.</FONT></P>
Line 55: Line 55:
</P>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">The main current  
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">The main current  
project of OSE is the Global Village Construction Set a set of 50
project of OSE is the Global Village Construction Set – a set of 50
Industrial Machines that allow for the creation of a small scale
Industrial Machines that allow for the creation of a small scale
civilization with modern comforts. </FONT>
civilization with modern comforts. </FONT>
Line 81: Line 81:
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>The
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>The
backbone of Open Source Ecology is open access to
backbone of Open Source Ecology is open access to
economically-significant information product designs, techniques,
economically-significant information – product designs, techniques,
and rapid learning materials for achieving this. Collaborative
and rapid learning materials for achieving this. Collaborative
development, 24/7 around the globe, leads to best practice designs -  
development, 24/7 around the globe, leads to best practice designs -  
Line 90: Line 90:
collaboration in open product an d process design leads to best
collaboration in open product an d process design leads to best
practices being commonly available. This is opposed to the dominant
practices being commonly available. This is opposed to the dominant
paradigm of today where a few companies having the best products
paradigm of today – where a few companies having the best products
or monopoly control, and by definition, the rest is mediocre. Open
or monopoly control, and by definition, the rest is mediocre. Open
economic development has the potential to raise the bar on the
economic development has the potential to raise the bar on the
quality of products in the productive economy as opposed to the
quality of products in the productive economy – as opposed to the
enforcement of mediocrity through protectionism and monopoly.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
enforcement of mediocrity through protectionism and monopoly.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
Line 100: Line 100:
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>All
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>All
wealth comes from nature  rocks, plants, sunlight, and water.
wealth comes from nature  – rocks, plants, sunlight, and water.
These are found ubiquitously. Yet the presence of strategic resources
These are found ubiquitously. Yet the presence of strategic resources
results in conflicts over their appropriation. “Hey, that's my oil
results in conflicts over their appropriation. “Hey, that's my oil
under your land.Open source technology can address this problem
under your land.” Open source technology can address this problem –
via principles of substitutability. There are many routes to
via principles of substitutability. There are many routes to
producing any economically significant product or service. Resilience
producing any economically significant product or service. Resilience
of communities depends on having a diversity of options. As open
of communities depends on having a diversity of options. As open
access to technology becomes commonplace, every community can
access to technology becomes commonplace, every community can
increase its level of productivity and appropriate technology to
increase its level of productivity and appropriate technology – to
the point that it can substitute any strategic material with local
the point that it can substitute any strategic material with local
options without any reduction in the standard of living while
options – without any reduction in the standard of living – while
contributing positively to global peace. </FONT></FONT></FONT>
contributing positively to global peace. </FONT></FONT></FONT>
</P>
</P>
Line 122: Line 122:
that their well-being comes from nature. This transparency is
that their well-being comes from nature. This transparency is
facilitated when economically productive activities happen as close
facilitated when economically productive activities happen as close
to the community as possible not out of sight, out of mind in
to the community as possible – not out of sight, out of mind in
remote locations. This is true environmental accountability as
remote locations. This is true environmental accountability – as
one tends to not destroy their own environment. Thus, there is a
one tends to not destroy their own environment. Thus, there is a
direct connection between transparency of production to natural
direct connection between transparency of production to natural
regeneration as people begin to make more sound production
regeneration – as people begin to make more sound production
choices by understanding the connection of production to the
choices – by understanding the connection of production to the
land. This means that industry no longer needs to occur in the form
land. This means that industry no longer needs to occur in the form
of toxic wastelands but instead eco-industry, on a human
of toxic wastelands – but instead – eco-industry, on a human
scale serving the needs of people, not centralized industries
scale – serving the needs of people, not centralized industries
competing for world domination. </FONT></FONT></FONT>
competing for world domination. </FONT></FONT></FONT>
</P>
</P>
Line 139: Line 139:
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>Thus,
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>Thus,
technology and technological literacy are a way to reconnect to
technology and technological literacy are a way to reconnect to
nature not to destroy it.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
nature – not to destroy it.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
<BR>
Line 146: Line 146:
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>The
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>The
above depends on increasing the density of knowhow and technology in
above depends on increasing the density of knowhow and technology in
every community which  comes from the open paradigm open
every community – which  comes from the open paradigm – open
information, open communication, open everything. The limit of
information, open communication, open everything. The limit of
optimal density of productive knowhow is the point that any community
optimal density of productive knowhow is the point that any community
is capable of producing the full range of essential resources
is capable of producing the full range of essential resources
necessary for it to exist, grow, and prosper. This is not to say that
necessary for it to exist, grow, and prosper. This is not to say that
trade should not happen but for community stability trade
trade should not happen – but for community stability – trade
should be avoided on essential products that the community needs. As
should be avoided on essential products that the community needs. As
much as a community would want otherwise when placed in a
much as a community would want otherwise – when placed in a
scarcity condition rationality goes out the window and people
scarcity condition – rationality goes out the window and people
start to kill each other.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
start to kill each other.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
Line 161: Line 161:
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>For
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>For
the first time in history we have a chance to do otherwise.
the first time in history – we have a chance to do otherwise.
Unleashed access to information and technology as availed by the
Unleashed access to information and technology – as availed by the
computer age means that any conflicts related to material
computer age – means that any conflicts related to material
scarcity can become a thing of the past. This includes resource
scarcity can become a thing of the past. This includes resource
conflicts, poverty, overpopulation, and even bureaucracy as
conflicts, poverty, overpopulation, and even bureaucracy – as
bureaucracy is not much more than  a mechanism to manage scarce
bureaucracy is not much more than  a mechanism to manage scarce
resources. Further, regulatory costs are minimized via technological
resources. Further, regulatory costs are minimized via technological
Line 176: Line 176:
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>This
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>This
is not a case for conflict between the rich and poor, the city or the
is not a case for conflict between the rich and poor, the city or the
country, the first or third worlds  it is a case where open
country, the first or third worlds  – it is a case where open
access to information helps everyone. As barriers to entry are
access to information helps everyone. As barriers to entry are
lowered, social upheaval is minimized. As production remains high
lowered, social upheaval is minimized. As production remains high –
and increases due to the elimination of competitive waste
and increases due to the elimination of competitive waste –
prosperity can only increase.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
prosperity can only increase.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
Line 192: Line 192:
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>This
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>This
does not address evolving as humans in cultural and scientific
does not address evolving as humans – in cultural and scientific
advancement - or in wisdom that prevents us from reverting to
advancement - or in wisdom that prevents us from reverting to
insanity. Open Source Ecology only lays a starting point and
insanity. Open Source Ecology only lays a starting point and
Line 219: Line 219:
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Distributive
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Distributive
Enterprise</I> - The distinguishing feature of this paradigm is a
Enterprise</I> - The distinguishing feature of this paradigm is a
focus on distributive enterprise open publishing of not only
focus on distributive enterprise – open publishing of not only
product designs, but also of open enterprise models so that others
product designs, but also of open enterprise models so that others
can replicate best practices.  There is a direct relationship between
can replicate best practices.  There is a direct relationship between
Line 225: Line 225:
forms the backbone for communities' infrastructures and their
forms the backbone for communities' infrastructures and their
prosperity. Open access to unprecedented high densities of productive
prosperity. Open access to unprecedented high densities of productive
information means economic prosperity and everybody wins.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
information means economic prosperity – and everybody wins.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
<BR>
Line 234: Line 234:
best-practice designs and techniques for producing  
best-practice designs and techniques for producing  
economically-significant products and services. One feature of the
economically-significant products and services. One feature of the
open source economy is Industry 2.0 or distributed, flexible
open source economy is Industry 2.0 – or distributed, flexible
production where access to a down-loadable repository of open
production – where access to a down-loadable repository of open
source design feeds local, multipurpose digital fabrication
source design feeds local, multipurpose digital fabrication
facilities. Such facilities - or powerful Microfactories  -  can
facilities. Such facilities - or powerful Microfactories  -  can
Line 249: Line 249:
development cycles 24/7 around the globe. When a sufficient number of
development cycles 24/7 around the globe. When a sufficient number of
stakeholders join a development process, it is a matter of time
stakeholders join a development process, it is a matter of time
before the development cycle yields the best designs and these
before the development cycle yields the best designs – and these
designs evolve continuously.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
designs evolve continuously.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
Line 255: Line 255:
</P>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">Integrated
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">Integrated
Economy </SPAN></I><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">
Economy </SPAN></I><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">–
</SPAN></SPAN><I><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">open</SPAN></I><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">
</SPAN></SPAN><I><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">open</SPAN></I><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">
fosters rapid learning (open IP) and low capitalization (open source
fosters rapid learning (open IP) and low capitalization (open source
products) ie., lower barriers to entry. Lower barriers to entry
products) – ie., lower barriers to entry. Lower barriers to entry
indicate that a single economic agent can have a broader range of
indicate that a single economic agent can have a broader range of
productivity, therefore more resilience from economic shocks. In the
productivity, therefore more resilience from economic shocks. In the
Line 272: Line 272:
</P>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">The
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">The
end of artificial material scarcity </SPAN></I><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">
end of artificial material scarcity </SPAN></I><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">–
Artificial material scarcity may be defined as the condition where
Artificial material scarcity may be defined as the condition where –
in the absolute abundance of resources namely rocks, plants,
in the absolute abundance of resources – namely rocks, plants,
water, and sunlight the distribution to humans is drastically
water, and sunlight – the distribution to humans is drastically
uneven.  Lowering barriers to entry helps to distribute production
uneven.  Lowering barriers to entry helps to distribute production
more widely. Product optimization from open development includes
more widely. Product optimization from open development includes
Line 287: Line 287:
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">Transparency
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">Transparency
of Resource Use and Feedback</SPAN></I><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">
of Resource Use and Feedback</SPAN></I><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">
Rapid learning in the open source economy helps people gain
– Rapid learning in the open source economy helps people gain
numeracy and technological literacy.  Technological literacy promotes
numeracy and technological literacy.  Technological literacy promotes
the understanding of production and specifically, the
the understanding of production – and specifically, the
relationship between natural resources and human population. Local
relationship between natural resources and human population. Local
resource use fosters a high level of resource feedback loops as
resource use fosters a high level of resource feedback loops – as
the state of the local environment is easily observable. Such
the state of the local environment is easily observable. Such
transparency of resource use is the solution to overpopulation in a
transparency of resource use is the solution to overpopulation in a
Line 300: Line 300:
</P>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">Lower
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">Lower
Cost </SPAN></I><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">
Cost </SPAN></I><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">–
by eliminating competitive waste, the cost of buying or making open
by eliminating competitive waste, the cost of buying or making open
source products is reduced significantly. </SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT>
source products is reduced significantly. </SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT>
Line 316: Line 316:
community-supported manufacturing (think Open Source Fab Lab in every
community-supported manufacturing (think Open Source Fab Lab in every
community). In the open economy of DIY ethics and local capacity and
community). In the open economy of DIY ethics and local capacity and
transparency - the cost of labor goes down  as the user can also
transparency - the cost of labor goes down  – as the user can also
learn to be the producer. In the limit of DIY ethic, this cost,
learn to be the producer. In the limit of DIY ethic, this cost,
defined as external cost - goes to zero and is replaced by one's
defined as cost of external labor - goes to zero – and is replaced
time. Further, in the limit of lifetime-design products, the time
by one's time. Further, in the limit of lifetime-design products, the
required for production is minimized, as production has to happen
time required for production is minimized, as production has to
only once. Thus, competitiveness </SPAN></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">with
happen only once. Thus, competitiveness with globalization is
global players is achieved by zero access barriers and local skill,
achieved by zero access barriers and local skill, and local social
and local social capital a different paradigm. </SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT>
capital – a different paradigm. </SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT>
</P>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
Line 334: Line 334:
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><B>Closing
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><B>Closing
the Nature-Technology Divide</B></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">
the Nature-Technology Divide</B></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">
Truly sound technology is not at odds with nature. We have a
– Truly sound technology is not at odds with nature. We have a
choice to produce technology in an environmentally sound way. For
choice to produce technology in an environmentally sound way. For
just about every harmful and polluting industrial process, a clean
just about every harmful and polluting industrial process, a clean
Line 345: Line 345:
if we appreciate that nature provides all material wealth, we are
if we appreciate that nature provides all material wealth, we are
inclined to take care of nature. This is a case for educating
inclined to take care of nature. This is a case for educating
generalists not technologists or environmentalists people who
generalists – not technologists or environmentalists – people who
understand technology deeply to the point that they respect nature
understand technology deeply to the point that they respect nature –
and people who understand the environment deeply to the point that
and people who understand the environment deeply to the point that
they they respect technology. Technological literacy is facilitated
they they respect technology. Technological literacy is facilitated
Line 357: Line 357:
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><B>Product
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><B>Product
Development Ecology</B></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">
Development Ecology</B></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">
In the mainstream, the designer is not the draftsman, the
– In the mainstream, the designer is not the draftsman, the
draftsman is not the engineer, the engineer is not the fabricator,
draftsman is not the engineer, the engineer is not the fabricator,
the fabricator is not the user, and the user is not the repairman.
the fabricator is not the user, and the user is not the repairman.
Line 365: Line 365:
factors, product service, environmental issues, or wealth
factors, product service, environmental issues, or wealth
distribution issues. Open source design addresses this, as it is
distribution issues. Open source design addresses this, as it is
design by the people, for the people and it is infinitely
design by the people, for the people – and it is infinitely
customizable.</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
customizable.</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
Line 371: Line 371:
</P>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>Environmental
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>Environmental
Regeneration </B><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">There is a
Regeneration </B><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">– There is a
direct link between open source technology and environmentalism. Open
direct link between open source technology and environmental
technology implies optimal technology and one part of
integrity. Open technology implies optimal technology – and one
optimization is optimization for environmental friendliness. Thus,
part of optimization is optimization for environmental friendliness.
the trend of environmental degradation can be reversed to
Thus, the trend of environmental degradation can be reversed to
environmental regeneration.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
regeneration.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><BR>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>PART
II</B></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>Tactical
Approach</B></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>To
create an open source economy, we are starting this a small but
sufficient subset, the GVCS 50. By developing the GVCS technology
kernel, we enable the community-based solution of relocalized
production. Because the GVCS  tools are selected based on their large
economic significance, this has widespread applications – such as
enterprise startup,  regeneration of urban decay, and building of
communities – both in the developed and developing world. Because
the GVCS is comprehensive, it is designed to provide a robust
solution for rebuilding communities from the ground up.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>Rollout
Plan</B></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>We
currently have $1/2M of funding to begin rapid parallel development
of the GVCS, with development of 14 further tools starting January 1,
2012. We aim to produce beta product releases of most of these tools
by April 1, 2012. From then, we will deploy the remaining 32
technologies, while documenting all results with global CAD and
instructionals support. Our goal is to secure a total of $5.5M for
2012 by January 31, 2012. We are including $2.5M for prototyping,
$2.5M for documentation and field testing, and $1/2M for deploying
the fully-featured, open source CAD/CAM solution. See OSE Enterprise
Plan video.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>We
have grown from about $20k/year for the past 4 years to $500k in the
last 2 months, and we have the ambitious goal of $5M more secured
within one month.  We pride ourselves in efficiency of resource
allocations. We spend about 98% of our resources directly on
prototypes built, and our overhead for the nonprofit sector donations
is 2% via a fiscal sponsor. We encourage you to donate and to put
your energy into this work.  We are doing a lot of the development
with volunteers, and Factor e Farm is the main development facility.
We are also outsourcing as much of the design, prototyping, and
documentation work as possible – as funding allows. Increased
resources mean increased burn-down rate for the GVCS 50 technologies.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>The
next 14 tools are:</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"> </FONT>
</P>
<OL>
<LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>CNC
Multimachine </I>– we are currently considering Dan Granett, a
precision machining expert – to build out the CNC Multimachine,
while utilizing any relevant techniques from a collaborating group -
the Open Source Multimchine project </FONT></FONT></FONT>
</P>
<LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>CNC
Circuit Mill </I>– Yoonseo Kang is the project lead on this at
Factor e Farm, and we are considering the <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/SnapLock">SnapLock
CNC</A> as our platform of choice, evaluating it at present before
starting deployment in January. Proposal Brief is forthcoming.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>Ironworker
Machine – Brianna Kufa is project lead, with initial design work
completed, and Proposal Brief forthcoming. We currently have a
<A HREF="http://blog.opensourceecology.org/2011/12/ironworker-shear-assembly-challenge-live-at-grabcad/">design
challenge up on GrabCAD</A> to develop an open source cutting blade
design.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>CNC
Torch Table – prototype I has been tested in producing tractor
parts with success, and optimization is needed for the software
tool-chain. We are currently considering an upgraded gantry shown
under <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/CNC_Torch_Table">Prototype
II on the wiki</A>, a simple DIY design which has seen many hundreds
of hours of production time and is a stable design. Z height control
needs to be developed.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Induction
Furnace</I> – <A HREF="http://blog.opensourceecology.org/2010/02/open-source-induction-furnace-continued/">conceptual
design</A> done. Considering  recruiting consulting assistance from
<A HREF="http://www.superior-power-components.com/">Superior
Induction</A>. Looking for subject matter experts to join this
project, Dedicated Project Visit or remote collaboration.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Sawmill</I>
– Prototype I 75% complete, ready for motor and blade attachment;
looking for Dedicated Project Visitor for field testing.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Backhoe</I>
– <A HREF="http://www.enniss.net/">Enniss Inc.</A> is being
considered for prototyping. </FONT></FONT></FONT>
</P>
<LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Bulllldozer</I>
– considering modified  LifeTrac frame and weights, jack shaft
wheel drive and steel wheels like in old agricultural traction
engines from 100 years ago; 10,000 lb weight for first prototype.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Well-drilling
rig </I>– considering design consulting from Enniss, Inc. Looking
for subject matter experts.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Modern
Steam Engine </I>– current plan is to use the <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Modern_Steam_Engine_Build">Wally
Munster</A> scalable modern design. Collaboration with Tom Kimmel of
Steam Auto Club of America to develop a plant for the next
generation of modern steam Power Cubes, about 4x3x3 feet in size for
s 25 hp Prototype 1. Plant includes Gasifier Burner, Heat Exchanger,
oil pump, water pump. Plan for Heat Exchanger is to work with Tom
using his open source coil winder.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Pelletizer</I>
– Need design and fabrication drawings. Can be fabricated by
Sweiger Shop readily. See pelletizer dies on <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Pelletizer/Research_Development">research
and development page</A> - and design around those.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Power
Inverter </I>– following the development of the CNC circuit mill,
we will prototype the inverter. Need power electronics subject
matter experts to join the team.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Solar
Concentrator </I>– the current plan is to build on documentation
available from the <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Solarfire">SolarFire
project</A>. Collaborating with <A HREF="http://www.calpoly.edu/~phys/faculty_pages/pschwartz.html">Dr.
Peter Schwartz</A> of Cal Poly on design evaluation.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
</OL>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>So,
You Want to Build a New Civilization?</B></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>All
right. Please go to the OSE Wiki and sign in. You will see a list of
the <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/GVCS">50 GVCS
technologies</A>, There is plenty of work left on the GVCS 50. Pick
one, and start contributing information. There is research and
development, where you can contribute conceptual design, analysis of
industry standards, diagrams, prior art, background research, and
other supporting information. Then comes the design stage – CAD,
calculations, simulations, fabrication drawings, etc.. Peer review is
useful. Then comes the build – which requires a bill of materials.,
sourcing, and a facility to build. We encourage you to work remotely
and contribute test data.  We invite you to write a <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Proposal_Template">Proposal
Brief</A>, and we can fund your work upon technical merit. Or you can
come for a <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Dedicated_Project_Visits">Dedicated
Project Visit</A> to Factor e Farm.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>Is
a technology of your choice not part of the official 50 GVCS list?
Then start new pages on the wiki for non-GVCS tools. The wiki is
infinitely expandable. The GVCS is only a limited but sufficient set
– limited so it remains a tractable project with a clear
deliverable. We don't really know if the choices made are the best –
but we will reevaluate after the set is done by year-end 2012. We
can't tell until we see all the devices work together as a complete
set. We just selected the 50 best ones according to <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/OSE_Specifications">OSE
Specifications</A> and the <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Product_Selection_Metric">Product
Selection Metric</A> almost 4 years ago.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>If
you are a subject matter expert, designer, video editor, CAD
draftsman, or other technical contributor in any of the 50
technologies – you are welcome to bid on work. We suggest you
submit a Proposal Brief. The key to the project is fining qualified
people – and we found that word of mouth and references from
trusted sources tend to provide best results. Help us find these
people.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>We
are also looking for full time people to join Factor e Farm –
master builder, farmer, fabrication manager, CEO, CTO, and
co-founder. With the farmer and builder, we need to continue field
testing the equipment while feeding our team, building out
infrastructure, building out our electrical grid, and making other
tools. We are looking for startup instigators, not employees – as
this type of risk-sharing is part of the responsibility that we seek
in our partners. </FONT></FONT></FONT>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>There
are other support roles. We also welcome you to join us in resource
development – the OSE Enterprise is an open business plan that you
can use. We are working on developing remote video editing capacity,
where you can edit remotely after downloading footage from our
repository – such as YouTube. We are looking for ongoing CAD,
fabrication drawing, simulation, and analysis support for
prototyping.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>Regarding
other branches, regional groups, or chapters, you are welcome to
start them. If you want to use the name of Open Source Ecology –
you will be expected to produce open source designs, blueprints, and
open enterprise models – as in our core mission. To do so, you will
be required to sign a Charter as an official OSE facility. We will be
developing these standards this year as we evolve into a truly global
movement, and we will start OSE International as an umbrella
organization. We will be expanding to all goods and services, but for
now, we are focusing on the GVCS 50 as the strategic core. Once
developed, this will provide the track record, process, and economic
power to diversify into other products and to facilitate the creation
of communities, enterprises, and countries. Remember that this is an
Apollo Program for the GVCS – and we expect to finish the 50 beta
product releases by December 21, 2012. If things continue as they are
now, we may be done ahead of schedule. This will place us with a much
larger index of possibilities for 2013.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>We
would like to continue making this one of the most collaborative
projects in the world: open engineering and open economic development
for the common good. </FONT></FONT></FONT>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>Appendix</B></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><B>Appendix –
Legacy Site for OSE</B></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">This is the
legacy site for Open Source Ecology from 2005. </FONT>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">Archived on
February 10, 2005, see Mission at
</FONT><A HREF="http://web.archive.org/web/20050210084651/http://sourceopen.org/">http://web.archive.org/web/20050210084651/http://sourceopen.org/</A><FONT COLOR="#000000">
</FONT>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P ALIGN=CENTER STYLE="margin-bottom: 0.2in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; widows: 2; orphans: 2">
<FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><FONT SIZE=5>Our
Mission</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P ALIGN=CENTER STYLE="widows: 2; orphans: 2"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><FONT SIZE=2 STYLE="font-size: 9pt"><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">by&nbsp;</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT><A HREF="mailto:marcin@sourceopen.org">Marcin
Jakubowski</A><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><FONT SIZE=2 STYLE="font-size: 9pt"><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">,
11.30.03</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE STYLE="margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; widows: 2; orphans: 2">
<FONT COLOR="#000000">&nbsp;<FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><B>I.
What is Open Source?</B></SPAN></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P STYLE="widows: 2; orphans: 2"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">Open
Source refers to the model of providing goods and services which
includes the possibility of the end-user's participation in the
production of these goods and services. This concept has already been
demonstrated in Linux, the open source computing system. With Linux,
a large number of software developers have contributed to creating a
viable alternative to the proprietary Windows computer operating
system. Many people can readily see the advantages- all Linux
software is free. Please read these articles on the concept of&nbsp;</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT><A HREF="http://web.archive.org/web/20050204102323/http://sourceopen.org/webpage/GlobalBizNet_OS_1.pdf">Open
Source software</A><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">&nbsp;and
its implications for&nbsp;</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT><A HREF="http://web.archive.org/web/20050204102323/http://sourceopen.org/webpage/GlobalBizNet_OS_2.pdf">changing
business</A><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">.&nbsp;<BR>&nbsp;</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE STYLE="margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; font-style: normal; widows: 2; orphans: 2">
<FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><B>II. What is
Open Source Economics?</B></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P STYLE="widows: 2; orphans: 2"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">Our
mission is to extend the Open Source model to the provision any goods
and services- Open Source Economics. This means opening access to the
information and technology which enables a different economic system
to be realized, one based on the integration of&nbsp; natural
ecology, social ecology, and industrial ecology. This economic system
is based on open access- based on widely accessible information and
associated access to productive capital- distributed into the hands
of&nbsp; an increased number of people. Read about an inspiring
example of such an economic model being currently put into practice
with respect to manufacturing&nbsp;</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT><A HREF="http://web.archive.org/web/20050204102323/http://sourceopen.org/webpage/OS_Car.pdf">vehicles</A><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">.</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; widows: 2; orphans: 2">
<FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman">We believe that a
highly distributed, increasingly participatory model of production is
the core of a democratic society, where stability is established
naturally by the balance of&nbsp; human activity with sustainable
extraction of natural resources. This is the opposite of the current
mainstream of centralized economies, which have a structurally
built-in tendency towards of overproduction.&nbsp;<BR>&nbsp;</FONT></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE STYLE="margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; font-style: normal; widows: 2; orphans: 2">
<FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><B>III. What is
Open Source Ecology?</B></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE STYLE="margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; widows: 2; orphans: 2">
<FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman">We derive our
organization's name from a concept which refers to the integration of
the natural, societal, and industrial ecologies- Open Source Ecology-
aiming at sustainable and regenerative economics. We are convinced
that a possibility of a quality life exists, where human needs are
guaranteed to the world's entire population- as long as we ask
ourselves basic questions on what societal structures and productive
activities are truly appropriate to meeting human needs for all. At
the end of the day, the goal is to liberate our time to engage in
exactly that which each of us wants to be doing- instead of what we
need to do to survive. All have the potential to thrive. Today, an
increasingly smaller percentage of the world's population is in this
position.&nbsp;</FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>Appendix</B></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><B>My Story </B></FONT>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><B>by Marcin
Jakubowski, 12.24.2011</B></FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">I have been asked
a number of times – what experiences led me to start OSE? I am
sharing my story here to shed some light on the formative experiences
influencing this work, with the hope that they may help to clarify
the approach.</FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">Ever since I was
a little child I wanted to apply science to creating human
prosperity. Wow – with all the Amazing technology around us –
life should be good. My father is a molecular biologist, and ushered
me to go high in academia. But the further I went the more useless I
felt, while noticing that there were pressing global ills to solve.
It was during my Ph.D. Program in Madison, WI, that I got
radicalized. I discovered first hand the myth of technology – with
ever improving technology, people are still working harder and
harder, missing out on the finer things in life. This troubled me
greatly.</FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">In Madison, there
was a string of events that led me to formulate the Open Source
Ecology concept. It actually started at Princeton U, where I went for
my undergraduate studies. I found Princeton to be a shocking wake-up
call – more a breeding place for the power structure of the world –
less a playground  for ideologues improving the human condition. I
vowed after this never to go to another Ivy League, and found myself
at U. Wisconsin, Madison, for grad school - a progressive,
rabble-rousing environment. Soon enough, I became totally
disillusioned with my studies – I was becoming more specialized and
useless every day – and I was learning theory about things that
didn't exist. I felt that was a great abnegation of human
responsibility – given that there are pressing issues in the world
to solve. So I started getting involved in the student community to
remain sane. I started the Polish Club to bring the Polish crowds
together, then Global Connections, to get all the internationals
together. Then I moved on to organize interdepartmental grad student
socials – since we never had a chance to interact with anyone
outside of our department. Since I was interested in energy, I
started a Global Energy Forum, and then Sustainability Forum to
immerse intellectually in sustainability issues, then Gandhi Network
to get some  hands-on experience beyond the mind, such as building a
solar dehydrator. Through all of these events, I learned 2 things.
First, people rarely collaborate or cross disciplines in their work.
Second – people did not have time to do cool things any more.
Lectures and workshops were  all fun and games – but they were
really brief sessions of escapism - as nobody really had the time to
pursue any of the topics discussed any more deeply. People go to the
talks and workshops - then they go back to work for <I>the man</I> on
Monday. What was needed was a different lifestyle, a new economy –
where people were not so alienated from their work, where they could
pursue the things that they really cared about. It is then that I
thought that civilization needed a thorough reboot in terms of right
livelihood and meaning in peoples' lives. The economy and environment
and social justice were all in havoc all over the world – yet
everybody was going about business as usual.</FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">Then it became
crystal clear to me – only if we collaborate truly openly – as in
creating an open source economy where people actually build freely on
each other's progress – only then can we achieve a sound economy –
and ample spare time. This became clear to me when even I  could not
discuss my PhD research openly with other university groups –
because we had hot stuff and competitive advantage for funding. Thus,
my learning process was hampered. That frustrated me to the point
that I decided I would work wholeheartedly to change this aspect of
modern civilization.</FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">In my last year
of the Ph.D. Program, I coined the Open Source Ecology concept. It
was about creating an open source economy – based on the principles
of collaboration that came from the open source software movement. I
claimed that if we operate openly, we learn more, we become more
responsible, which includes responsibility for taking care of nature
– as it is the source of all of our material well-being. Therefore,
open source ecology refers to the integration of human and natural
ecosystem into a harmonious system of interactions, based on open
source principles of cooperation.</FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">Any civilization
starts with access to land – so in my civilization reboot
experiment, land was the first thing I secured after my PhD. In the
initial phases, with little money and big dreams, voluntary
simplicity was my only option, and I explored the limits of how
little one could do with. But that got old after some time. I was
living like a hippie in the woods with a pocket knife, and it
occurred to me quickly that a firm economic foundation and powerful
tools were necessary if one is to face nature and ask her to provide
directly for one's needs. I also learned quickly that use of nature
does not have to mean abuse of nature.. I also learned that we have
the technology to do things right – in harmony with nature – and
it is only greed and myths that dictate that human prosperity should
be at odds with nature. I learned first hand from the land - that
nature is abundant – and that general human prosperity is a matter
of distribution – not production.</FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">So with this, my
tractor broke, and the rest is history as you see in my TED Talk of
2011. Point is: we can create open source equivalents to industry
standards – AND take care of the environment, AND in fact, we can
do much better all together by eliminating the inefficiencies of
competitive waste in all its forms. Globalization is a simple
manifestation of competitive waste – competing for strategic
resources because we refuse to learn how to use local resources more
cunningly to achieve the same ends.</FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">I also come from
Poland, with its long history of war, surrounded by powerful
neighbors. My grandfather was in the Polish underground engaging
sabotage actions against Nazis during WWII, and he was a horseback
soldier in WWI. My grandmother was in a concentration camp. I read
all types of books on these troubling topics, as they are fascinating
– regarding the nature of the human spirit under extremes of
conditions – playing out  the good old fight of good versus evil. I
pictured myself living in those times, and still have bad dreams from
time to time - and put myself in the place of the people in these
books - and consider how I would act myself. And today, I grasp to
understand why we are still so un-evolved as humans, still killing
one another. The most fascinating explanation I have yet read on the
topic – and interestingly – from a survivor of turbulent
political times of post-WWII Poland himself – is <I>Political
Ponerology: a Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political
Purposes</I>. That is the most important book on the topic of
achieving general human prosperity that I have read. It is a
psychological study that explains why psychopaths tend to move up in
corporate boardrooms and positions of power – and how all of us
support them - in getting there. </FONT>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">Today I do my
part in the open source 'underground' – a fringe movement still,
waiting to be the next trillion dollar industry. Except this time, it
will not be a centralist phenomenon – but a movement  created by
many independent players. If we open source a few critical yet
sufficient technologies for survival as a species – then a shining
example can be set, and a solid economic foundation can be laid –
for human progress. My role is to seed a kernel, in the form of the
GVCS 50 tools – and the economic power created will take care of
the rest.</FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">What is the rest?
When people address basic material scarcity – a new economy, and
new politics, will follow. It will be a new paradigm. What do I see
myself doing then? I will be spending my full attention on how to
become a better human, and helping others to do the same. This
depends on material scarcity being removed as one of the stresses
affecting humanity, as mastering material security is a prerequisite
if we want to have a fair chance – of evolving to freedom.</FONT></P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">New education,
new communities, new politics – they are all around the corner.
Even when the world is cracking at the seams, the human spirit will
never die. </FONT>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">How are you doing
your part to play this out?  </FONT>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
<P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
</P>
</P>
</BODY>
</BODY>
</HTML>
</HTML>

Revision as of 07:06, 26 December 2011

The Open Source Ecology Paradigm

Marcin Jakubowski, Ph.D., 12.24.2011

part of the OSE Christmas Gift to the World of 2011


Introduction


The Open Source Ecology Paradigm is an idea that the open source economy is a route to human prosperity in harmony with natural life support systems.


OSE is a movement to create the open source economy. The movement consists of hundreds of entrepreneurs, producers, engineers, makers, and supporters around the world – who believe in the power of open – who share the open ethic. The 'Ecology' in the name refers to the interaction of natural and human ecosystems – the environmental, societal, and technological systems – as they interact along open principles. Read a further description of the OSE concept as it was formulated initially in 2003 (see Appendix). Since then, the concept has evolved to a platform for creating distributive enterprise, as a solid foundation for a sound economy - a third economic option beyond capitalism or socialism. The distributive economy paradigm centers around open access to efficient production as a means to transcend artificial material scarcity. The paradigm uses open source tools and techniques to produce advanced civilization – by unleashing the power of the responsible use of technology.


The main current project of OSE is the Global Village Construction Set – a set of 50 Industrial Machines that allow for the creation of a small scale civilization with modern comforts.


OSE Mission


The mission of Open Source Ecology is to create an open source economy - an economy that optimizes both production and distribution, while providing environmental regeneration and social justice.


Overview of the OSE Paradigm


The backbone of Open Source Ecology is open access to economically-significant information – product designs, techniques, and rapid learning materials for achieving this. Collaborative development, 24/7 around the globe, leads to best practice designs - accessible openly via the internet. When economic productivity is unleashed as such, there is a direct effect on community prosperity. As a result of lowered barriers to entry, each community can increase the range of products and services that it can provide. Global collaboration in open product an d process design leads to best practices being commonly available. This is opposed to the dominant paradigm of today – where a few companies having the best products or monopoly control, and by definition, the rest is mediocre. Open economic development has the potential to raise the bar on the quality of products in the productive economy – as opposed to the enforcement of mediocrity through protectionism and monopoly.


All wealth comes from nature – rocks, plants, sunlight, and water. These are found ubiquitously. Yet the presence of strategic resources results in conflicts over their appropriation. “Hey, that's my oil under your land.” Open source technology can address this problem – via principles of substitutability. There are many routes to producing any economically significant product or service. Resilience of communities depends on having a diversity of options. As open access to technology becomes commonplace, every community can increase its level of productivity and appropriate technology – to the point that it can substitute any strategic material with local options – without any reduction in the standard of living – while contributing positively to global peace.


Transparency of the connection between technology and nature means that people begin to respect nature. This happens when people begin to respect that their well-being comes from nature. This transparency is facilitated when economically productive activities happen as close to the community as possible – not out of sight, out of mind in remote locations. This is true environmental accountability – as one tends to not destroy their own environment. Thus, there is a direct connection between transparency of production to natural regeneration – as people begin to make more sound production choices – by understanding the connection of production to the land. This means that industry no longer needs to occur in the form of toxic wastelands – but instead – eco-industry, on a human scale – serving the needs of people, not centralized industries competing for world domination.


Thus, technology and technological literacy are a way to reconnect to nature – not to destroy it.


The above depends on increasing the density of knowhow and technology in every community – which comes from the open paradigm – open information, open communication, open everything. The limit of optimal density of productive knowhow is the point that any community is capable of producing the full range of essential resources necessary for it to exist, grow, and prosper. This is not to say that trade should not happen – but for community stability – trade should be avoided on essential products that the community needs. As much as a community would want otherwise – when placed in a scarcity condition – rationality goes out the window and people start to kill each other.


For the first time in history – we have a chance to do otherwise. Unleashed access to information and technology – as availed by the computer age – means that any conflicts related to material scarcity can become a thing of the past. This includes resource conflicts, poverty, overpopulation, and even bureaucracy – as bureaucracy is not much more than a mechanism to manage scarce resources. Further, regulatory costs are minimized via technological transparency - as a technologically-literate populace of the open source age becomes increasingly responsible for its own actions.


This is not a case for conflict between the rich and poor, the city or the country, the first or third worlds – it is a case where open access to information helps everyone. As barriers to entry are lowered, social upheaval is minimized. As production remains high – and increases due to the elimination of competitive waste – prosperity can only increase.


This is a paradigm shift. That is the core of Open Source Ecology.


This does not address evolving as humans – in cultural and scientific advancement - or in wisdom that prevents us from reverting to insanity. Open Source Ecology only lays a starting point and foundation - from which evolution becomes possible.


Open


We support everything open. See the notions of open at the Shuttleworth Foundation - http://www.shuttleworthfoundation.org/about-us/our-philosophy/open-reporting/


Economy and Ecology


Distributive Enterprise - The distinguishing feature of this paradigm is a focus on distributive enterprise – open publishing of not only product designs, but also of open enterprise models so that others can replicate best practices. There is a direct relationship between open design and lowering of barriers to entry. Productive enterprise forms the backbone for communities' infrastructures and their prosperity. Open access to unprecedented high densities of productive information means economic prosperity – and everybody wins.


The open source economy is an economic system marked by open access to best-practice designs and techniques for producing economically-significant products and services. One feature of the open source economy is Industry 2.0 – or distributed, flexible production – where access to a down-loadable repository of open source design feeds local, multipurpose digital fabrication facilities. Such facilities - or powerful Microfactories - can produce just about anything that a community will need - local food, energy, housing, or cars. This is distinct from centralized production facilities that exist today.


An open source economy produces designs by global collaboration, with development cycles 24/7 around the globe. When a sufficient number of stakeholders join a development process, it is a matter of time before the development cycle yields the best designs – and these designs evolve continuously.


Integrated Economy – open fosters rapid learning (open IP) and low capitalization (open source products) – ie., lower barriers to entry. Lower barriers to entry indicate that a single economic agent can have a broader range of productivity, therefore more resilience from economic shocks. In the limit of extreme diversity on the part of the producers, every community can attain a complete economy. If product evolution involves advanced techniques for material substitution, then every community can attain a complete economy based on local resources. This is the solution to resource conflicts. This is stability in the face of global economic upheaval.


The end of artificial material scarcity – Artificial material scarcity may be defined as the condition where – in the absolute abundance of resources – namely rocks, plants, water, and sunlight – the distribution to humans is drastically uneven. Lowering barriers to entry helps to distribute production more widely. Product optimization from open development includes optimization for lifetime of use. Lifetime design (ie, lower maintenance costs), combined with high productivity and low barriers to entry - indicates that material abundance can be the general human condition. This is a solution to poverty.


Transparency of Resource Use and Feedback – Rapid learning in the open source economy helps people gain numeracy and technological literacy. Technological literacy promotes the understanding of production – and specifically, the relationship between natural resources and human population. Local resource use fosters a high level of resource feedback loops – as the state of the local environment is easily observable. Such transparency of resource use is the solution to overpopulation in a rational (materially abundant) society.


Lower Cost – by eliminating competitive waste, the cost of buying or making open source products is reduced significantly.


Competitiveness with Globalization - When IP access barriers are eliminated in the open source economy, cost of production is reduced to production capitalization and labor. The cost of production capitalization, under the assumption of flexible fabrication assisted by automation - goes to zero in the scenario of community-supported manufacturing (think Open Source Fab Lab in every community). In the open economy of DIY ethics and local capacity and transparency - the cost of labor goes down – as the user can also learn to be the producer. In the limit of DIY ethic, this cost, defined as cost of external labor - goes to zero – and is replaced by one's time. Further, in the limit of lifetime-design products, the time required for production is minimized, as production has to happen only once. Thus, competitiveness with globalization is achieved by zero access barriers and local skill, and local social capital – a different paradigm.


Ecology


Closing the Nature-Technology Divide – Truly sound technology is not at odds with nature. We have a choice to produce technology in an environmentally sound way. For just about every harmful and polluting industrial process, a clean alternative may be found. Biomimicry shows us the way to do this in many cases. Moreover, truly sound technology should bring us closer to nature -

ie, if we appreciate that nature provides all material wealth, we are inclined to take care of nature. This is a case for educating generalists – not technologists or environmentalists – people who understand technology deeply to the point that they respect nature – and people who understand the environment deeply to the point that they they respect technology. Technological literacy is facilitated by introduction of true technical education, as opposed to industry standard marketing forces.


Product Development Ecology – In the mainstream, the designer is not the draftsman, the draftsman is not the engineer, the engineer is not the fabricator, the fabricator is not the user, and the user is not the repairman. While is is touted as the pinnacle of specialization, this introduces a lack of accountability between all these steps, and therefore, inferior product design when considered from the human ergonomic factors, product service, environmental issues, or wealth distribution issues. Open source design addresses this, as it is design by the people, for the people – and it is infinitely customizable.

Environmental Regeneration – There is a direct link between open source technology and environmental integrity. Open technology implies optimal technology – and one part of optimization is optimization for environmental friendliness. Thus, the trend of environmental degradation can be reversed to regeneration.