XM Review Standards: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#Define Problem Statement to involve others in development for transperancy and ability of both parties to assess the situation | #Define Problem Statement to involve others in development for transperancy and ability of both parties to assess the situation | ||
##Quick video can show this. | ##Quick video can show this. | ||
##Introduce yourself if it's your first video | |||
##For hardware, take object, picture, or design - and discuss it in an under 5 minute video for the component. | |||
##Potentially set up space for this in XM Project Page | |||
#CAD available for review - CAD is prerequisite | #CAD available for review - CAD is prerequisite | ||
##In absence of CAD, drawings may suffice | ##In absence of CAD, drawings may suffice | ||
Revision as of 18:51, 25 March 2012
- Define Problem Statement to involve others in development for transperancy and ability of both parties to assess the situation
- Quick video can show this.
- Introduce yourself if it's your first video
- For hardware, take object, picture, or design - and discuss it in an under 5 minute video for the component.
- Potentially set up space for this in XM Project Page
- CAD available for review - CAD is prerequisite
- In absence of CAD, drawings may suffice
- Static pictures for key mechanisms and processes presented clearly
- XM Project Page has review materials in a separate window?
- Everything documented at x Project XM Review page on wiki