Next Phase GVCS in 2 Minutes: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
*Gets people to understand that they can do it, too
*Gets people to understand that they can do it, too
*Focus on life-size legos as the metaphor?
*Focus on life-size legos as the metaphor?
Problem:
*The technical feasibility of this is beyond the scope of most people
*Even further beyond the scope is that people can do this themselves
=Background Materials=
*[[GVCS in 2 Minutes]]
*[[GVCS TED Talk]]
*[[1 Day Production Run]] - extreme efficiencies of collaborative production demonstrated in Dec, 2012
*[[OSE Character Brief]]
=Suggested Script=

Revision as of 20:01, 14 February 2013

We would like to create a sequel to the GVCS in 2 Minutes. Chris Traub of Strategic Executive Search whom I met at TED told me that my next step towards recruiting should be refining our message. So I am thinking of organizing a sprint/hackathon where we get scriptwriter/branding/animation people together to put together a script that would be the sequel to the GVCS in 2 Minutes and my TED Talk, and would really aim at explaining in 2 minutes how to turn dirt and twigs into advanced civilization That is difficult for people to wrap their head around, yet is to me so clear, not only in feasibility but execution. It is a constant frustration to me that I can't explain it to others.

The specs are:

  • Language agnostic - so it would have to be in the style of the Full Printed explainer video - in speechless clarity.
  • Explains the GVCS with just enough technical detail to inspire people with feasibility, but not too much
  • Gets people to understand that they can do it, too
  • Focus on life-size legos as the metaphor?

Problem:

  • The technical feasibility of this is beyond the scope of most people
  • Even further beyond the scope is that people can do this themselves

Background Materials

Suggested Script