Torch Table Build: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Rack for x motion - cheapest, most robust solution for precise motion | *Rack for x motion - cheapest, most robust solution for precise motion | ||
*Spring-loaded | |||
=Blender Concept= | =Blender Concept= | ||
[[Image:torchconceptlawrence.jpg]] | [[Image:torchconceptlawrence.jpg]] | ||
=Torch vs. Plasma Cutter= | |||
*Comes down to initial cost versus long-term cost | |||
*Plasma cutters - consumables cost $20 for 5 new electrodes and nozzle heads | |||
**Electrodes are rated for 45 minutes to 60 minutes for 1/2" steel | |||
**More expensive versions state they last 4 times longer - are heavier and have better temperature control | |||
**For anything above 1 inch, torch is better | |||
* | |||
[[Category:Torch Table]] | [[Category:Torch Table]] | ||
Revision as of 23:41, 18 August 2009
Design Rationale
- Rack for x motion - cheapest, most robust solution for precise motion
- Spring-loaded
Blender Concept
Torch vs. Plasma Cutter
- Comes down to initial cost versus long-term cost
- Plasma cutters - consumables cost $20 for 5 new electrodes and nozzle heads
- Electrodes are rated for 45 minutes to 60 minutes for 1/2" steel
- More expensive versions state they last 4 times longer - are heavier and have better temperature control
- For anything above 1 inch, torch is better