Open Source Development: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== How can open source development and licensing address technology transfer conflict within the post-Kyoto climate change negotiations? ==
== How can open source product development and licensing address technology transfer conflict within the post-Kyoto climate change negotiations? ==
'''''a research paper on how Open Source Ecology can address technology transfer conflict within post-Kyoto climate negotiations concerning "low carbon development"'''''
'''''a research paper considering how Open Source Ecology can diffuse through an open source climate change adaptation and mitigation development regime'''''


==Online Resources==
==Online Resources==

Revision as of 15:56, 6 November 2009

How can open source product development and licensing address technology transfer conflict within the post-Kyoto climate change negotiations?

a research paper considering how Open Source Ecology can diffuse through an open source climate change adaptation and mitigation development regime

Online Resources

Survey Search Terms

  • innovation economics, intellectual property rights (IPR), public domain, free and open source

Notes


References

  • Söderberg, Johan. (2007) Hacking capitalism: the free and open source software movement Volume 9 of Routledge research in information technology and society.
    • "The Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) movement demonstrates how labour can self-organise production, and, as is shown by the free operating system GNU/Linux, even compete with some of the worlds largest firms. The book examines the hopes of such thinkers as Friedrich Schiller, Karl Marx, Herbert Marcuse and Antonio Negri, in the light of the recent achievements of the hacker movement. This book is the first to examine a different kind of political activism that consists in the development of technology from below."