Pellet Production: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 8: Line 8:


The key is using pellets instead of wood chips - which are highly flowable and allow for system size much smaller than log or chip fired systems.
The key is using pellets instead of wood chips - which are highly flowable and allow for system size much smaller than log or chip fired systems.
Sawdust can be used, but is not necessary.


<html><iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/421fHJEBScQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>
<html><iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/421fHJEBScQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>

Latest revision as of 18:10, 26 June 2015

Concept: produce pellets from abundant biomass. This is a multi-billion dollar market local economy option, and can get major buy-in from any community development organization. It is carbon neutral in the traditional sense, and carbon negative if pellets are turned to biochar for agricultural practices. A turnkey system would consist of:

  • Hammermill/chopper for taking in any source of biomass. minor hammermilling is required with straw or hay feedstock
  • Pelletizer. If automated, agricultural residue comes in on one side, pellets come out the other.
  • Char maker - produces char pellets
  • Gasoline engine - runs on char gas via a gasifier

This simple device is equivalent to exxon megarefineries, and is environmentally much more sound.

The key is using pellets instead of wood chips - which are highly flowable and allow for system size much smaller than log or chip fired systems.

Sawdust can be used, but is not necessary.