Potential Natural Vegetation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fufeaLBLGlk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></html> | <html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fufeaLBLGlk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></html> | ||
=Preparation= | |||
Hammermill for perforation material. Avoid vermipost, which releases nutrients quickly. | |||
Latest revision as of 21:33, 6 September 2015
SOPs
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/z2bi8tul3u99bti/AADuhFQwQMWj7R5QwD-w75t_a/SOP-%20Physical%20Test.doc?dl=0
Potential Natural Vegetation
Concept: we are matching adapted plants to a site, and adding supporting biomass to it (assuming it's been depleted). We are not concerned about missing minerals, which are found in rocks and soil already.
Look at soil analysis docs - [1]
Ball tests - soil particle size analysis
Preparation
Hammermill for perforation material. Avoid vermipost, which releases nutrients quickly.