OSE Strategy Notes: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
=Summary of Points=
=Summary of Points=
*Develop OSE Linux, via quick [[MVP]] test-driven prototype, and iterate.
*Build relationships with key community leaders to develop the key OSE tools, from CAD to marketing, etc. This is because we are overtly building upon prior open knowledge.
*Build relationships with key community leaders to develop the key OSE tools, from CAD to marketing, etc. This is because we are overtly building upon prior open knowledge.
*Engage a high performing team of part time professionals (minimum 4 hours per week), with strict hiring and firing procedures, as in the [[Rare Genomics Institute]] model.
*Engage a high performing team of part time professionals (minimum 4 hours per week), with strict hiring and firing procedures, as in the [[Rare Genomics Institute]] model.

Revision as of 17:12, 6 December 2015

Summary of Points

  • Develop OSE Linux, via quick MVP test-driven prototype, and iterate.
  • Build relationships with key community leaders to develop the key OSE tools, from CAD to marketing, etc. This is because we are overtly building upon prior open knowledge.
  • Engage a high performing team of part time professionals (minimum 4 hours per week), with strict hiring and firing procedures, as in the Rare Genomics Institute model.

Rationale

  • Open products must get only to a minimum level of effectiveness before their economic cost advantage becomes a compelling motive for adoption and further development. This starts with early adopters.
  • Unfunded development can go onluly so far, as economic pressure is a major competitor with voluntary contributors.
  • However, the revolution cannot be funded, typically because those who have gained by the system are too engrained in it, and it is difficult for them to see outside
  • Complex, integrated enterprises are primary targets. In the more radical sense, autonomous communities are most favorable places for deployment. However, since there is a large entry barrier to creating an integrated package, there are limits to this strategy. Thus, we start small.
  • Starting small may well.involve the mass creation of right livelihood.
  • The pen is mightier than the sword - for those who have mastered the sword. This means that organizing social + social capital can be leveraged honestly only after one has shown a track record of getting their hands dirty and gained a deep understanding of the issue.

Points to Consider

  • Fund close collaborators via the Xtreme Manufacturing Workshop Model.
  • Build relationships with key allies while educating about distributive enterprise, regenerative development, and open source culture.

Other