OSE Strategy Notes: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
*Promote use of [[OSHW Dashboard]] across different OSHW projects and groups
*Promote use of [[OSHW Dashboard]] across different OSHW projects and groups
*Promote use of [[Development Template]] to fulfill [[OSHW Best Practices]]
*Promote use of [[Development Template]] to fulfill [[OSHW Best Practices]]
*
*Seek to develop a network of tool providers (software, hardware, publicity, sense-making, organizational, enterprise)


=Rationale=
=Rationale=

Revision as of 19:22, 6 December 2015

Summary of Points

  • Focus on mass creation of right livelihood as a potent route towards self determination. Does anyone argue this point?
  • Establish Mass Creation of Right Livelihood as the key long term and short term metric for attaining self-determination - the most potent driver of humanity - as a result of OSE's work. This is consistent with OSE's mission to create the open source economy, as self-determination is facilitated by open source, Distributive Enterprise.
  • Redefine the open source economy as a system of livelihood (as distinct from jobs) in which a person has a fair chance to pursue self-determination.
  • Develop OSE Linux, via quick MVP test-driven prototype, and iterate. This allows development tool use scaling at the cost of one hour per new contributor, with zero cost to OSE as the new contributor commits to the install.
  • Build relationships with key community leaders to develop the key OSE tools, from CAD to marketing, etc. This is because we are overtly building upon prior open knowledge.
  • Engage a high performing team of part time professionals (minimum 4 hours per week), with strict hiring and firing procedures, as in the Rare Genomics Institute model.

Collaboration Strategy

Rationale

  • Open products must get only to a minimum level of effectiveness before their economic cost advantage becomes a compelling motive for adoption and further development. This starts with early adopters.
  • Unfunded development can go onluly so far, as economic pressure is a major competitor with voluntary contributors.
  • However, the revolution cannot be funded, typically because those who have gained by the system are too engrained in it, and it is difficult for them to see outside
  • Complex, integrated enterprises are primary targets. In the more radical sense, autonomous communities are most favorable places for deployment. However, since there is a large entry barrier to creating an integrated package, there are limits to this strategy. Thus, we start small.
  • Starting small may well.involve the mass creation of right livelihood.
  • The pen is mightier than the sword - for those who have mastered the sword. This means that organizing social + social capital can be leveraged honestly only after one has shown a track record of getting their hands dirty and gained a deep understanding of the issue.

Points to Consider

  • Fund close collaborators via the Xtreme Manufacturing Workshop Model.
  • Build relationships with key allies while educating about distributive enterprise, regenerative development, and open source culture.

Other