CEB Press Future Work: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
#Update manual-built machine to the new drawer guides. That means redesign of machine width.
#Update manual-built machine to the new drawer guides. That means redesign of machine width.
#Update new machine (CNC version) for the most robust drawer guide system.
#Update new machine (CNC version) for the most robust drawer guide system.
#Work out the control scheme for 30 gpm, which is the full power operation.  Right now it crashes after 20 gpm and 6 full bricks per minute. The upper pressing rate should be at least 8 full bricks and at least 10 smaller bricks.
#'''Work out the control scheme for 30 gpm, which is the full power operation.  Right now it crashes after 20 gpm and 6 full bricks per minute. The upper pressing rate should be at least 8 full bricks and at least 10 smaller bricks.'''
#Update the code for testing mode and pressing mode
#Update the code for testing mode and pressing mode
#Redesign the controller for the bugs in it (spacing too tight) to allow for a DIY version
#Redesign the controller for the bugs in it (spacing too tight) to allow for a DIY version

Revision as of 17:21, 25 January 2016

I can simply request that he do the things that REALLY add value, which are:

  1. Do all 3D CAD work in FreeCAD
  2. Generate toolpath files for CNC cutting of metal for the using FreeCAD Path Module
  3. Update manual-built machine to the new drawer guides. That means redesign of machine width.
  4. Update new machine (CNC version) for the most robust drawer guide system.
  5. Work out the control scheme for 30 gpm, which is the full power operation. Right now it crashes after 20 gpm and 6 full bricks per minute. The upper pressing rate should be at least 8 full bricks and at least 10 smaller bricks.
  6. Update the code for testing mode and pressing mode
  7. Redesign the controller for the bugs in it (spacing too tight) to allow for a DIY version
  8. Produce a professionally fabricated turnkey controller + enclosure (built and populated by a circuit fab)
  9. Design a proper mounting system for the controller
  10. Resolve the shaker issue. Most of our machines blew out the shaker motor
  11. Develop reliable hydraulics sourcing of main pressing cylinder. Until now, it's hit or miss whether we can find a hydraulic cylinder. Many times it's out of stock from Baileys, which means making modifications for mounting other cylinders - a good waste of time.
  12. Update hydraulics diagrams to reflect the current version.
  13. Optimize the angle of repose on the hopper.
  14. Develop a version that does not use the shaker motor, but a manual shaker, thus saving about $700 in machine cost
  15. Develop an economy version that uses a manual valve, not the automated controller, thereby getting the cost to more like $3000 for the machine if built for the manual version.
  16. Create a BOM for different countries in a prioritized order of countries. (USA, Canada, Mexico, Spain, etc.)
  17. Create a Distributive Enterprise Manual publication that discusses: (1) how to produce the machines in an Extreme Manufacturing workshop setting; (2) how to produce the machine by taking the plans to a professional fabricator, including the controller; (3) complete set of instructions for a DIY build, for both CNC cut and non-CNC versions; (4) complete set of instructions for an economy version with manual controls, non-CNC version, with 20 GPM limit
  18. Collaborate with the India people, who are currently developing manufacturing of the manual CEB press.

Otherwise, the instructionals of 2014 are good enough for the souped up CNC version, outside of polishing. The real work lies in updating the main (18) items/needs above. The main issues currently are the systems issues as above - primarily tech design points.

Potential Master's Thesis Work

The machine needs development. For a Master's Thesis, there is a number of technical developments to be made. Advanced topics would include designing and building an open source manual hydraulic control valve or electric solenoid valve. The latter is $800 for the current machine, but could be produced for $200 if open source. Easier topics would be to refine some of the design elements. Other topics could include more of a production engineering / product development angle: developing the machine for production, especially for flexible fabrication - and turning it to a marketable product. On the controls front, there is the controller and code to refine, and on the CAE side, there is structural analysis to be done. Further, we are developing the CNC torch table for automated production of the machine, including oxyhydrogen cutting for low resource environments which may not have acetylene, but do have access to water for generating oxyhydrogen - such as Africa.