Sunday June 5 Notes: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:


The support required for that is an HR position to keep everybody psychologically happy comma and a project manager just to follow up with all the project management tasks.
The support required for that is an HR position to keep everybody psychologically happy comma and a project manager just to follow up with all the project management tasks.
Within one year the pilot program has been created within 2 years we can have two cycles of students and within three years we can have four cycles of students. This means that we can try to double at every iteration. Maybe leave one cycle to do development or perhaps do one cycle of three six months take off for 3 months and then recruit again so maybe visible only to have one cycle of students per year from 2 students we could possibly go to 6 or 12 but the question would be where is the infrastructure.
This means some commitments development here. I'll be really interested making this a world-class Center and scaling it up to a thousand acres to produce the local economy?
The framework is that every student develops and publishes a sub Enterprise model like for example everyone learns how to build the housing butt a minor project is curious how to run another workshop on a different machine or a different product. This means that we develop a whole package of products that we can produce on demand with 3 Day scale preparation periods.
Operationally speaking how do we ensure this kind of growth if we assume that product sales and services are the bootstrap funding model. We teach so we gain the extra revenue of teaching but which is the part that allows for viral replication worldwide?

Revision as of 22:56, 5 June 2016

The product must be good. What is the most likely product can be excellent? The house is perhaps the number one winner and because it allows us to include all the different features that go into a house. That means that around the house which is a central product weekend include all the other technology development. The house must be a viable product. Performance goals are $10,000 per person two weeks of labor.

Within three years the goal is to achieve an open-source product development process which produces a product 10 times better cheaper and faster. We have already demonstrated 10 times faster and more or less 10 times cheaper now the question is better. By focusing on the construction site approach any product can be better. It can be modified as needed and as this design for a lifetime.

How does this appear in the world? First it's an option that has gone viral. Everyone on the planet understands that they can get a low cost home that they can build themselves. It will be a renaissance of people design their own houses.

Economically the fact will be to reduce the power of financial manipulation significantly as people gain control over the single largest expense in your life.

Politically this will mark an era of larger autonomy, where people have gained autonomy on one of their basic needs.

Ethically this will be a rebirth because people have mastered one of their needs.

On the open source project development methodology there's a key number of items that have never been put together Under One Roof to enable open collaboration on product development. For us the job is to figure out what these are and Implement them in a way that both individuals and companies can use them. The limit of this is local production microfactories and regenerative housing. The living environment integrates with the natural environment and a huge separation is no longer seen between the two. Just like indigenous people. We we inhabit the Earth 4 production the first open source material production facility demonstrates how local materials can be created anywhere for construction where construction now becomes a 0 polluter from its previous status as a super polluter IE the highest building sector on the planet. This works by recycling Plastics and let's talk about the personal life as far as throwing this model out.

A training program would focus on recruiting SMS, recruiting top candidates and producing Superior product while generating revenue from tuition and from actual builds. The commitment from the students is that of Lifestyle investment and that the students will do this for their work.

The support required for that is an HR position to keep everybody psychologically happy comma and a project manager just to follow up with all the project management tasks.

Within one year the pilot program has been created within 2 years we can have two cycles of students and within three years we can have four cycles of students. This means that we can try to double at every iteration. Maybe leave one cycle to do development or perhaps do one cycle of three six months take off for 3 months and then recruit again so maybe visible only to have one cycle of students per year from 2 students we could possibly go to 6 or 12 but the question would be where is the infrastructure.

This means some commitments development here. I'll be really interested making this a world-class Center and scaling it up to a thousand acres to produce the local economy?

The framework is that every student develops and publishes a sub Enterprise model like for example everyone learns how to build the housing butt a minor project is curious how to run another workshop on a different machine or a different product. This means that we develop a whole package of products that we can produce on demand with 3 Day scale preparation periods.

Operationally speaking how do we ensure this kind of growth if we assume that product sales and services are the bootstrap funding model. We teach so we gain the extra revenue of teaching but which is the part that allows for viral replication worldwide?