Bhakti log: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Mon March 6, 2018)
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The video while creating the cube is:
https://youtu.be/yMxVxpw83OM
https://youtu.be/yMxVxpw83OM


Bhakti Kulkarni - 02/27/2018
The log file is uploaded at:
[[http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/File:OSE_test2.fcstd]]


How many hours each part of the test took to complete:  
How many hours each part of the test took to complete:  
Line 9: Line 12:


Score yourself 0-100 based on the percentage of the Test points that you have completed successfully - and include that score in your work log comments. -- I would give myself 60% as I could not add the background score and that it took me too long to complete the test.
Score yourself 0-100 based on the percentage of the Test points that you have completed successfully - and include that score in your work log comments. -- I would give myself 60% as I could not add the background score and that it took me too long to complete the test.
Also, I did not understand how to create the wiki log page for long time. We have to search for the name of the log and then click on create log link - this was not intuitive work flow for me. If this is explained in the developer test, it might be easier for others to follow.

Revision as of 04:38, 7 March 2018

The video while creating the cube is: https://youtu.be/yMxVxpw83OM

The log file is uploaded at: [[1]]

How many hours each part of the test took to complete: 1) Installing Linux - 5 hours 2) Learning FreeCAD - 20 hours 3) Documenting your work--and which section was most difficult. -- Documenting took almost 7 hours. The section that was difficult was finding a screw that was long enough to pass through 2 tubing. Also, the video that I recorded did not open with kdenlive. Had to find alternatives, so could not add the background noise.

Score yourself 0-100 based on the percentage of the Test points that you have completed successfully - and include that score in your work log comments. -- I would give myself 60% as I could not add the background score and that it took me too long to complete the test.

Also, I did not understand how to create the wiki log page for long time. We have to search for the name of the log and then click on create log link - this was not intuitive work flow for me. If this is explained in the developer test, it might be easier for others to follow.