Electric Motor Windings: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*Aluminum may have more skin effect, and be less efficient for certain high efficiency applications. [https://www.hammondpowersolutions.com/files/HPS-CoppervsAluminumWindings.pdf] | *Aluminum may have more skin effect, and be less efficient for certain high efficiency applications. [https://www.hammondpowersolutions.com/files/HPS-CoppervsAluminumWindings.pdf] | ||
*Heat storage capacity of aluminum is 2x as large, so aluminum can withstand larger overlaod conditions - [http://www.emersonindustrial.com/en-US/egselectricalgroup/aboutus/faq/Pages/Catalog034-02-2012.aspx] | *Heat storage capacity of aluminum is 2x as large, so aluminum can withstand larger overlaod conditions - [http://www.emersonindustrial.com/en-US/egselectricalgroup/aboutus/faq/Pages/Catalog034-02-2012.aspx] | ||
*Cost breakdown of transformers indicates ~20% for the windings, ~35% for magnetic steel. -[http://www.ee.co.za/article/aluminium-vs-copper-conductors-transformer-manufacture.html] |
Revision as of 17:15, 27 April 2018
- Aluminum windings DO compare well to copper windings based on resistivity and density considerations.
- See resistivity - [1] - aluminum is under 2x more resistive than copper.
- But aluminum density is 2.7 g/cm3 - whereas copper is 9 g/cm3. Thus, >3x as heavy in its density. This means that the weight of windings will actually be lighter for the same current flowing through the winding. Which means that a motor of the same power is likely to be lighter (though larger in size) - unless the non-winding parts of the motor are all together heavier because of the larger volume of the motor.
- The relevance for the GVCS is eliminating the need for copper if aluminum from clay is acceptable - such that an electrical power economy can likewise be produce without strategic resources such as copper.
- This article verify that aluminum-wound electric motors are feasible - [2]
- Aluminum carries 2x the current per pound compared to copper, and is 1/2 to 1/4 the cost - making aluminum windings 4-8 times less expensive than copper windings - [3]
- Aluminum may have more skin effect, and be less efficient for certain high efficiency applications. [4]
- Heat storage capacity of aluminum is 2x as large, so aluminum can withstand larger overlaod conditions - [5]
- Cost breakdown of transformers indicates ~20% for the windings, ~35% for magnetic steel. -[6]