OS synthetic biology: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Despite the amazing technological progress in biological understanding and techniques there is an unacknowledged crisis forming in the ownership of IP and ability of individuals without institutional backing to engage in the field. Currently the majority of funding is through government programs which only fund institutionally based proposals, while these institutions foster a dependency on institutional power in established researchers and trainees. IP regulations recognize a copyright for those first to describe biological knowledge which prevents emergent implementation of the information. Additionay the IP genersted by these programs is ultimately owned by the institution and senior researchers. These situations are leading to the concentration of technical abilities in bureaucratic based organizations. This situation is diametric to the OS ethos, and will require a response to lay out an alternative path. | Despite the amazing technological progress in biological understanding and techniques there is an unacknowledged crisis forming in the ownership of IP and ability of individuals without institutional backing to engage in the field. Currently the majority of funding is through government programs which only fund institutionally based proposals, while these institutions foster a dependency on institutional power in established researchers and trainees. IP regulations recognize a copyright for those first to describe biological knowledge which prevents emergent implementation of the information. Additionay the IP genersted by these programs is ultimately owned by the institution and senior researchers. These situations are leading to the concentration of technical abilities in bureaucratic based organizations. This situation is diametric to the OS ethos, and will require a response to lay out an alternative path. | ||
=Areas of utility= | |||
=Open source genetics= | =Open source genetics= |
Revision as of 21:37, 19 June 2018
While the machines that humans make require a knowledgeable maker with the necessary tools for replication, the machinery of life is inherently able to self-replicate. As humans have come to understand the molecules of life, the information storage capacity, and how this is converted into a tightly choreographed yet chaotic self-perpetuating series of chemical reactions, the forces of life looks less like a mystery and more like a energy that can be harnessed (just as has been done with wind, solar, tidal, geothermal and fossil fuels). The universal code of life (written in DNA->RNA->proteins) is now not only readable but writable. In the same way a computer program can be shared from one machine to another without a cost to the creator and generating more overall wealth, biological programs that provide human utility can be shared to increase wealth and the standard of living of all. Thus OS synthetic biology will be fundamental to achieving post-scarcity.
Synthetic Biology
The current life science crisis
Despite the amazing technological progress in biological understanding and techniques there is an unacknowledged crisis forming in the ownership of IP and ability of individuals without institutional backing to engage in the field. Currently the majority of funding is through government programs which only fund institutionally based proposals, while these institutions foster a dependency on institutional power in established researchers and trainees. IP regulations recognize a copyright for those first to describe biological knowledge which prevents emergent implementation of the information. Additionay the IP genersted by these programs is ultimately owned by the institution and senior researchers. These situations are leading to the concentration of technical abilities in bureaucratic based organizations. This situation is diametric to the OS ethos, and will require a response to lay out an alternative path.