PhD Theses on Open Hardware: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
made by those involved in their development. Therefore, the question of how and by whom  
made by those involved in their development. Therefore, the question of how and by whom  
these choices are made is of great importance to both individuals and societies.
these choices are made is of great importance to both individuals and societies.
*By facilitating
*Thus, a democratization of the technosphere, if allowed to flourish, has the potential
some actions and not others, technologies help define the realm of options available to their
to give rise to technologies that better reflect a democratic society’s citizenry, address a
users and, in this way, influence individual and collective behaviors. The configurations and
broader range of social and individual concerns, and enrich the experience of humans as
affordances of technologies, in turn, are the result of intentional or unintentional choices
authors of their own lives and vital social beings. In other words, it enables the  
made by those involved in their development. Therefore, the question of how and by whom
transformation of the technosphere into a public sphere.
these choices are made is of great importan


=Peter Maxigas=
=Peter Maxigas=
*September 2015 - '''Peer Production of Open Hardware''' - Peter Dunajcsik - [http://osi.blogs.uoc.edu/2015/09/18/thesis-on-open-hardware-in-hackerspaces-successfully-defended-by-peter-dunajcsik-maxigas/]
*September 2015 - '''Peer Production of Open Hardware''' - Peter Dunajcsik - [http://osi.blogs.uoc.edu/2015/09/18/thesis-on-open-hardware-in-hackerspaces-successfully-defended-by-peter-dunajcsik-maxigas/]

Revision as of 05:22, 18 January 2019

Dr. Catarina Mota

Janauary 2015 - Bits, Atoms, and Information Sharing: New Opportunities for Participation - Catarina Mota, seminal thesis on Open Source Hardware - on Academia.edu. Dpwnload: File:Openhardwarephd Mota.pdf

Quotes

  • A democratization of the technosphere

promises to bring to the forefront challenges that firms and markets currently have no incentive to address.

  • By facilitating

some actions and not others, technologies help define the realm of options available to their users and, in this way, influence individual and collective behaviors. The configurations and affordances of technologies, in turn, are the result of intentional or unintentional choices made by those involved in their development. Therefore, the question of how and by whom these choices are made is of great importance to both individuals and societies.

  • Thus, a democratization of the technosphere, if allowed to flourish, has the potential

to give rise to technologies that better reflect a democratic society’s citizenry, address a broader range of social and individual concerns, and enrich the experience of humans as authors of their own lives and vital social beings. In other words, it enables the transformation of the technosphere into a public sphere.

Peter Maxigas

  • September 2015 - Peer Production of Open Hardware - Peter Dunajcsik - [1]