OSE Incentive Challenge 2020: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "*320k people own 3d printers in 2015 - [https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+people+own+a+3d+printer&oq=how+many+people+own+a+3d+printer&aqs=chrome..69i57.10093j0j4&client...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*320k people own 3d printers in 2015 - [https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+people+own+a+3d+printer&oq=how+many+people+own+a+3d+printer&aqs=chrome..69i57.10093j0j4&client=ms-android-verizon&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8] | *320k people own 3d printers in 2015 - [https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+people+own+a+3d+printer&oq=how+many+people+own+a+3d+printer&aqs=chrome..69i57.10093j0j4&client=ms-android-verizon&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8] | ||
*Basic question is why are people not getting involved when expected payback per year is $300-2000? [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0957415813001153?via%3Dihub]. An answer to this lies in first testing the prints suggested and seeing the outcome. One side is developing the production engineering so it is highly reliable - at this point, it appears that | |||
=Incentive Design= | =Incentive Design= | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
#Requirements are specified for performance, admissible parts and interface design | #Requirements are specified for performance, admissible parts and interface design | ||
#The trick lies in explicit specification of modules in a way that degenerates design to a high degree towards a specific implementation. | #The trick lies in explicit specification of modules in a way that degenerates design to a high degree towards a specific implementation. | ||
#Degenerate production engineering - one slicer, one operating system, one machje, one software toolchain, one package. Trick here is reconciling diversity of options with starting a business. For widespread distribution, we need the most open tools possible. | |||
Revision as of 16:17, 2 April 2019
- 320k people own 3d printers in 2015 - [1]
- Basic question is why are people not getting involved when expected payback per year is $300-2000? [2]. An answer to this lies in first testing the prints suggested and seeing the outcome. One side is developing the production engineering so it is highly reliable - at this point, it appears that
Incentive Design
- Enforced collaboration by requiring use of accepted modules pending clear interface design
- Requirements are specified for performance, admissible parts and interface design
- The trick lies in explicit specification of modules in a way that degenerates design to a high degree towards a specific implementation.
- Degenerate production engineering - one slicer, one operating system, one machje, one software toolchain, one package. Trick here is reconciling diversity of options with starting a business. For widespread distribution, we need the most open tools possible.