Continuous Clay Printer Conceptual Design: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
#Is settling effective, or will the clay remain too wet? | #Is settling effective, or will the clay remain too wet? | ||
#Is "plaster table"-like dewatering required? | #Is "plaster table"-like dewatering required? | ||
=Working Doc= | |||
<html><iframe src="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vSFA0NsWSnVikYSP7iH8q6jNoVtKiqzkVQLhd183aEXju8aO1V1RFAc0C1zNogYZpqVtfEqnK6oPvWR/embed?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000" frameborder="0" width="480" height="389" allowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true"></iframe></html> | |||
[https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/12ruprMiUrlnLkHCvqPS7dwPpsnNcSfhrZWRNIG1eXxI/edit edit] | |||
Revision as of 18:53, 19 April 2020
Concept:
- Clay powder and water is used to allow easy mixing
- Excess water allows easy mixing in a columnar vessel just by using a mixing blade like in a blender
- Allow time for clay to settle out
- Once settled, air pressure can be applied to push the clay out, with excess water on top acting as the 'piston'
- Clay is pushed out through an extruder
- Print head has a valve that shuts clay flow on/off, but retraction is not easily done
Questions:
- Is settling time acceptably short (such as one day)?
- Is settling effective, or will the clay remain too wet?
- Is "plaster table"-like dewatering required?
Working Doc