Why GNU Hurd Never Got off the Ground: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Idealistic. Did not join the ''worse is better'' philosophy, ie, ''it's not the best but works great'' approach of Linux. [https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/edl9t/so_whats_the_deal_with_gnu_hurd_will_it_ever_be/] | *Idealistic. Did not join the ''worse is better'' philosophy, ie, ''it's not the best but works great'' approach of Linux. [https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/edl9t/so_whats_the_deal_with_gnu_hurd_will_it_ever_be/] | ||
* | *''There are many open source projects like this - some neat features, somewhat incomplete, worked on by a small but devoted team. HURD is just a very high-profile example.'' This is a relevant point for OSE. A point of traction must be reached at one point in order to become immortal. | ||
<html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4vW62KqKJ5A" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></html> | <html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4vW62KqKJ5A" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></html> | ||
Revision as of 01:28, 6 January 2021
- Idealistic. Did not join the worse is better philosophy, ie, it's not the best but works great approach of Linux. [1]
- There are many open source projects like this - some neat features, somewhat incomplete, worked on by a small but devoted team. HURD is just a very high-profile example. This is a relevant point for OSE. A point of traction must be reached at one point in order to become immortal.