Air Motor: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:53, 13 May 2025

60% efficient, Livermore [1]. Implies standard air motors are 10-20% efficient. But even with that - that is good.
Compressor efficiency calculation, hard core - [2]

Revision as of 17:51, 13 May 2025 (view source) Marcin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:53, 13 May 2025 (view source) Marcin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*60% efficient, Livermore [https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/27739-harmonic-air-motor-offers-very-high-efficiency#:~:text=The%20Harmonic%20Air%20Motor%20developed,be%20manufactured%20at%20lower%20cost.]. Implies standard air motors are 10-20% efficient. But even with that - that is good.		*60% efficient, Livermore [https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/27739-harmonic-air-motor-offers-very-high-efficiency#:~:text=The%20Harmonic%20Air%20Motor%20developed,be%20manufactured%20at%20lower%20cost.]. Implies standard air motors are 10-20% efficient. But even with that - that is good.
			*Compressor efficiency calculation, hard core - [https://www.jmcampbell.com/tip-of-the-month/2015/07/how-to-estimate-compressor-efficiency/]