Talk:Biochar Crusher: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Added an Internal Link)
(Added some thoughts/ideas of mine)
 
Line 6: Line 6:


MJ
MJ
____________
*On the note of to crush or not to crush, i think it depends on what the goal is:
**If your goal is [[Carbon Sequestration]] / [[Fill]] probably not (Although if compacting it a ton, a fine powder may sink less?)
**If your goal is for it to be mixed into the soil well and upgrade that soil to [[SABE]] ( [[Terra Preta]] ) a fine powder is probably best
*GRANTED citation needed
*In terms of knowns:
**"How Permanent is Pyrogenic Carbon in a Live Soil" is one of the big concerns in [[Biochar as a Means of Carbon Sequestration]] , uncertain on the current state of the art on that
**Surface Area is your Friend*
***Only unknow of this is what role coarse debris/rocks would play in a Soil
***Might help stabilize soil/prevent erosion, also do larger chunks hold onto water better?
***The ORIGINAL [[Amazonian Black Earth]] Soils also had [[Terra Cotta]] / [[Pottery Sherds]] so that may be a relevant piece of the puzzle, not powderized charcoal
*Ways to go about it all:
**Pre-Grinding of Waste via a [[In-Sink Wet Waste Grinder]]
**Post-Grinding in a Yard Waste Grinder / Consumer Level [[Electric Woodchipper]] (Coarser Grind, but low complexity+maintainance concerns)
**Post-Grinding via a [[Hammermill]] (Especially with higher [[Air Classifier]] integrated models can produce a very fine, consistent mix.  Bit of a maintenance / [[Combustible Dust Explosion]] + [[Fugitive Dust Emissions]] concern
***Also unlike other methods could probably NOT handle Wet Charcoal well due to clumping/clogging concerns
**Post-Grinding in a [[Ball Mill]]
***Would probably have to be in a Batch Configuration, and is LOUD, but could be done with Wet Charcoal and get to any desired Particle Size
--[[User:Eric|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric|talk]]) 22:53, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:53, 12 October 2025

Rasmus,

Thanks for the wiki contributions. Can you add some info on Pelletized Biochar ?

Our proposed route is continuous charcoal production on a desktop scale by making pellets first, then using them in hydronic stoves to generate heat while producing charcoal in a continuous process. This has great potential for wide adoption because the plant size is reduced significantly, and we'd like to prototype a desktop bioachar maker this year, such that it's a practical part of any home.

MJ

____________

  • On the note of to crush or not to crush, i think it depends on what the goal is:
    • If your goal is Carbon Sequestration / Fill probably not (Although if compacting it a ton, a fine powder may sink less?)
    • If your goal is for it to be mixed into the soil well and upgrade that soil to SABE ( Terra Preta ) a fine powder is probably best
  • GRANTED citation needed
  • In terms of knowns:
    • "How Permanent is Pyrogenic Carbon in a Live Soil" is one of the big concerns in Biochar as a Means of Carbon Sequestration , uncertain on the current state of the art on that
    • Surface Area is your Friend*
      • Only unknow of this is what role coarse debris/rocks would play in a Soil
      • Might help stabilize soil/prevent erosion, also do larger chunks hold onto water better?
      • The ORIGINAL Amazonian Black Earth Soils also had Terra Cotta / Pottery Sherds so that may be a relevant piece of the puzzle, not powderized charcoal
  • Ways to go about it all:
    • Pre-Grinding of Waste via a In-Sink Wet Waste Grinder
    • Post-Grinding in a Yard Waste Grinder / Consumer Level Electric Woodchipper (Coarser Grind, but low complexity+maintainance concerns)
    • Post-Grinding via a Hammermill (Especially with higher Air Classifier integrated models can produce a very fine, consistent mix. Bit of a maintenance / Combustible Dust Explosion + Fugitive Dust Emissions concern
      • Also unlike other methods could probably NOT handle Wet Charcoal well due to clumping/clogging concerns
    • Post-Grinding in a Ball Mill
      • Would probably have to be in a Batch Configuration, and is LOUD, but could be done with Wet Charcoal and get to any desired Particle Size

--Eric (talk) 22:53, 12 October 2025 (UTC)