Talk:Material properties: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added some thoughts of mine) |
(Added some more information) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
--[[User:Eric|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2026 (UTC) | --[[User:Eric|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric|talk]]) 11:58, 22 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
Here’s the link: | |||
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ | |||
Also worth noting that it’s good enough for “back of the envelope” [[Napkin Math]] type stuff, but Certifiable Designs/Intensive Decisions probably need a better source. | |||
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskEngineers/comments/btzdkh/how_reliable_is_engineering_toolbox_for_data/ | |||
I think one of the recent [[USCSB]] incidents was due to them not verifying the materials they were receiving. | |||
--[[User:Eric|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric|talk]]) 12:03, 22 January 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:03, 22 January 2026
There was some website that had all sorts of stuff like this; “Engineering Toolbox” if i remember correctly? I’ll go grab the link.
--Eric (talk) 11:58, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
Here’s the link:
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/
Also worth noting that it’s good enough for “back of the envelope” Napkin Math type stuff, but Certifiable Designs/Intensive Decisions probably need a better source.
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskEngineers/comments/btzdkh/how_reliable_is_engineering_toolbox_for_data/
I think one of the recent USCSB incidents was due to them not verifying the materials they were receiving.