Integration from Module Schemas to Full Model: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=About= | |||
This must be done not by gurus—by clerks following specs. | This must be done not by gurus—by clerks following specs. | ||
Why? Because of this - [https://chatgpt.com/share/69745a2f-5cfc-8010-9b29-09fe48aa4c1a]. In short: The real risk is not skill level—it’s unconscious substitution. The danger is not incompetence. The danger is: “I know a better way to do this.” | Why? Because of this - [https://chatgpt.com/share/69745a2f-5cfc-8010-9b29-09fe48aa4c1a]. In short: The real risk is not skill level—it’s unconscious substitution. The danger is not incompetence. The danger is: “I know a better way to do this.” | ||
=Howto= | |||
The core simplification: '''Assembly is not geometry. Assembly is topology.''' Geometry already exists at the module level. Assembly is simply how modules are connected. | |||
If you accept that, everything downstream becomes tractable. | |||
Revision as of 05:55, 24 January 2026
About
This must be done not by gurus—by clerks following specs.
Why? Because of this - [1]. In short: The real risk is not skill level—it’s unconscious substitution. The danger is not incompetence. The danger is: “I know a better way to do this.”
Howto
The core simplification: Assembly is not geometry. Assembly is topology. Geometry already exists at the module level. Assembly is simply how modules are connected.
If you accept that, everything downstream becomes tractable.