Talk:Humanoid Robot: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Saved Progress Mid-Long Edit) |
(Added some thoughts of mine) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
**The [[Robot Cell]] without a Robot type issue is VERY important too | **The [[Robot Cell]] without a Robot type issue is VERY important too | ||
***You either use Soft Robotics/Heavily Limit the Robot’s Performance…or have to go out of your way to make sure it doesn’t accidentally knock someone down/crush something etc | ***You either use Soft Robotics/Heavily Limit the Robot’s Performance…or have to go out of your way to make sure it doesn’t accidentally knock someone down/crush something etc | ||
**38:00 | |||
***Mentions how a Translator Bot is replaced by a Translation App on a phone in a pocket | |||
****Even if needed for etiquette etc, to an extent an intergalactic [[Kiss Bow or Shake Hands]] would mostly work | |||
***Mentions how instead of a Humanoid Robot the size of a Refrigerator etc…you could get a [[Robotic Vacuum Cleaner]] (or depending on price+budged, multiple), a Doorbell Camera, and an [[Electronic Pet Door]] etc | |||
***Essentially no need for a monolithic, expensive humanoid robot when a mix of smaller more dedicated robots would suffice | |||
Latest revision as of 23:05, 4 April 2026
While they don’t make sense in 90% of applications versus a Non-Humanoid Non-Generalist Robot, but rather a Specialized Robotic Vacuum and Robotic Sorter etc, for the few applications they DO make sense in (essentially the initial Darpa Proposal / how the robot dogs can’t walk up curved tank farm stairs etc there is ONE oshw project, but probably less dexterity than Boston Dynamics Atlas , hard to make intrinsically safe, dependent on premapped movements/teleoperation (The Mechanical Turk Issue ) and also C O S T L Y
I’ll grab links though
--Eric (talk) 15:24, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
- A Video by the YouTube Channel “Angela Collier” Titled “humanoid robots belong in the trash”
- Clickbaity title to an extent, but hear her out
- There is some background in terms of “When it actually matters to the plot that something is accurate” (ie The Expanse/Intersteller vs the use of a “It Just Worksium-Drive” and it being fine etc…versus that Lucy movie where the premise RELIES upon the dumb science and is inherently bad etc
- ~16:55 is where the discussion on Humanoid Robots work
- Also was the distinction between Humanoid Robots, and Robotic Persons (as it was put in Pluto)
- Ie a dishwasher is a robot, a humanoid robot in this sense is not a person, it is a dishwasher in the humanoid form. A Non-Human Consciousness in a Synthetic/Electromechanical Human Body is a whole other rant
- 27:44 is where specifically the Human Shape Issue is brought up (before that it was moreso battery discussion which could POTENTIALLY change with technology)
- The Robot Cell without a Robot type issue is VERY important too
- You either use Soft Robotics/Heavily Limit the Robot’s Performance…or have to go out of your way to make sure it doesn’t accidentally knock someone down/crush something etc
- 38:00
- Mentions how a Translator Bot is replaced by a Translation App on a phone in a pocket
- Even if needed for etiquette etc, to an extent an intergalactic Kiss Bow or Shake Hands would mostly work
- Mentions how instead of a Humanoid Robot the size of a Refrigerator etc…you could get a Robotic Vacuum Cleaner (or depending on price+budged, multiple), a Doorbell Camera, and an Electronic Pet Door etc
- Essentially no need for a monolithic, expensive humanoid robot when a mix of smaller more dedicated robots would suffice
- Mentions how a Translator Bot is replaced by a Translation App on a phone in a pocket