Talk:OSE GNU/Linux Build: Difference between revisions
(→cad: new section) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
It's not Open-Source | It's not Open-Source | ||
--[[User:Comzeradd|comzeradd]] 13:59, 18 January 2012 (CET) | --[[User:Comzeradd|comzeradd]] 13:59, 18 January 2012 (CET) | ||
== page organization == | == page organization == | ||
Revision as of 00:33, 29 July 2012
Sage
I recommend adding Sage to the build (if it's not too much effort) as a general tool.
Jason 08:37, 26 May 2012 (CEST)
ArchLinux
I've created a thread to discuss the Suitability of ArchLinux as a basis to OSE-specific Linux Build.
Elifarley 23:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Fedora & rpm
I'm thinking of creating a meta-package rpm. I think we don't need yet another distribution, but meta-packages for existing distributions. --comzeradd 13:59, 18 January 2012 (CET)
Sketchup
It's not Open-Source --comzeradd 13:59, 18 January 2012 (CET)
page organization
yoonseo is working on a tool chain for electronics. perhaps this page should list groups by use. like all software for circuits, then another section for machine design. or something? --Dorkmo 04:05, 27 May 2012 (CEST)
waste
was reading something about winamp that led to some other stuff. found this: http://sourceforge.net/projects/waste/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WASTE might be an interesting community environment even if it wasnt really used for the encrypted aspect. im not electing this to be included in the ose build but placing here if others might find it interesting. --Dorkmo 02:39, 26 June 2012 (CEST)
cad
http://www.techdrivein.com/2011/08/8-best-cad-apps-for-linux.html