Technical Collaboration Standards: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#Work references, personal references | #Work references, personal references | ||
#Volunteer or paid work? | #Volunteer or paid work? | ||
#Type of engagement sought: Design, Prototyping ,Dedicated Project Visit, Remote Prototyping, Remote Design | #Type of engagement sought: Design, Prototyping ,Dedicated Project Visit, Remote Prototyping, Remote Design, on site, consulting, hire, mentor, advisor? | ||
#Resources they have available | #Resources they have available | ||
#Resources needed | #Resources needed | ||
Revision as of 20:59, 28 September 2012
OSE Core team has specific standards for engaging in collaboration
Offers for Development Assistance - General Checklist for Evaluation
- Resume/qualifications
- Video interview - Summary of Interview
- Work samples
- Work references, personal references
- Volunteer or paid work?
- Type of engagement sought: Design, Prototyping ,Dedicated Project Visit, Remote Prototyping, Remote Design, on site, consulting, hire, mentor, advisor?
- Resources they have available
- Resources needed
- Time Frame for project delivery
- What is the design specification? What is his assessment of our specification?
- How are we approaching Test
- What is the specific stage of the project that he wants to work?
- Can you do a project plan? Milestones and metrics of evaluation.
- So that is a proposal, we will take 2 weeks to review it.
For collaboration purposes - have above documentation for project manager on our side:
- Do we have a review team for the project?
- Do we build capacity?
- Do we have the budget?
- What else is needed?