Talk:OSE License: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[User:Marie.Byleen|Marie.Byleen]] 11:56, 3 January 2011 (PST)I saw the CEB plans on OpenPario are licensed with a Creative Commons ShareAlike (cc-by-sa) license. Is this because it is the work of a contributor that is choosing to retain rights that the blanket statement given by this license does not apply to? Can contributors retain rights to their work while contributing to OSE work as a whole, or will this work not be included under the OSE umbrella?  
11:56, 3 January 2011 (PST)I saw the CEB plans on OpenPario are licensed with a Creative Commons ShareAlike (cc-by-sa) license. Is this because it is the work of a contributor that is choosing to retain rights that the blanket statement given by this license does not apply to? Can contributors retain rights to their work while contributing to OSE work as a whole, or will this work not be included under the OSE umbrella?  


Also, has anyone considered appending a cc0 waiver that others could use as a license if they needed to?
Also, has anyone considered appending a cc0 waiver that others could use as a license if they needed to?

Latest revision as of 19:38, 30 January 2013

11:56, 3 January 2011 (PST)I saw the CEB plans on OpenPario are licensed with a Creative Commons ShareAlike (cc-by-sa) license. Is this because it is the work of a contributor that is choosing to retain rights that the blanket statement given by this license does not apply to? Can contributors retain rights to their work while contributing to OSE work as a whole, or will this work not be included under the OSE umbrella?

Also, has anyone considered appending a cc0 waiver that others could use as a license if they needed to?