EIR Review Process

From Open Source Ecology
Revision as of 19:13, 11 March 2016 by Marcin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

One key to dveloplent performance is ongoing review for organizational learning.

Review can take many forms.

  • Plans should be published for formal and informal review. FB, blog, Linked In groups can be a great source of review. For this to work, content should be published in a reviewable format.
  • An executive summary is reviewable, and should be published. Further, it should be published on an ongoing basis for improvement.
  • A business plan is reviewable as long as it has clarity and sufficient t information for review. Revenue projections, workflows, ergonomics and time requirements, process improvements, marketing strategies, execution details, tech ology reviews, and many other elements if a business plan can be reviewed. The key is detailed analysis of each element, such that a business plan is backed up by a study of Industry Standards, market research, and other studies.
  • SME DE webinars can be leveraged by requesting time from leaders i n the field.
  • SMEs can be solicited deliberately for feedback
  • An advisory team should be created from top SMEs .
  • Weekly review should explore SWOT analysis, and address weaknesses by tapping strengths
  • Effective means of communication should be developed to facilitate digestibility of content that is up for review.
  • A formal review meeting via the internet should be organized on a regular basis, such as quarterly.
  • A log should facilitate review by communicating effort, which is reviewable for time and priority allocation.
  • Blog posts can update on progress, and solicit feedback. Active distribution to potential reviewers can help this.
  • Monthly review can include a specific list of key issues to explore, so atemplate for monthly project review should be drawn up.