How a Court Case Works

From Open Source Ecology
Revision as of 21:34, 7 July 2024 by Marcin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A court case is a conversation between two parties. Like in regular conversation, you can say things back and forth to negotiate a solution, except there are several differences compared to a regular conversation. Here we examine sufficient evidence, how we may admit it, and how we may block it. This discussion revolves around the case of a hostile, bad faith, egregious, reckless, and dishonorable opponent as evidenced by their performance. This extreme case is taken to underscore methods by which a pro se party can secure justice.


  1. The court can hear anything, but it doesn't mean that what you say will be admitted into evidence. Before you admit something into evidence, a basis must be established for the relevance, non-prejudice, hearsay, first hand knowledge, and other factors. Here, one must understand all the Qualities that Allow Evidence To Be Admissible. Otherwise - this evidence will be ignored completely.
  2. You can say anything, but you are liable for verity, and liable for perjury if under oath.