Review Ecology

From Open Source Ecology
Revision as of 08:54, 4 February 2015 by Marcin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=Introduction= Review can take place in many forms, from simple micro-tasks to more complex. *'''Social Media posts''' - Simple review requests for comments. Strategy: Organi...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Introduction

Review can take place in many forms, from simple micro-tasks to more complex.

  • Social Media posts - Simple review requests for comments. Strategy: Organize a list of top 100 places to post. Requires a social media manager or two. Answers are then brought over to OSE's platform, for further upvote. Implement this immediately in Wordpress.
  • Crowd - upvoting content, submitting content. Can be implemented via question, answer, upvote and comment on answer.
  • Calculations - given certain designs - calculations or other upgrading/processing can be made upon them for refining the design

SMEs - doing more formal review, calculations Improvement - general feedback for organizational learning.


Review refers to existing work; contribution refers to value input. Both should be used. Concept is that if a mechanism for micro-time-binding is developed, then advanced technology developent can happen. Micro Time-Binding requires documentation. Conjcept: micro-review can distill widsom of crowds if a mechanism is created. Concept: while micro-contributions can be not helpful if mismanaged, the trick is to create a platform for micro-time-binding contributions.



Tools