Injection Molding Energy Requirements

From Open Source Ecology
Revision as of 18:24, 8 May 2020 by Marcin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "An ab-initio case can be made that injection molding takes more energy than 3D printing, because the mold has to cool between cycles. That means probably 25%-50% less energy e...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

An ab-initio case can be made that injection molding takes more energy than 3D printing, because the mold has to cool between cycles. That means probably 25%-50% less energy efficiency than 3D printing, where you don't have to cool the final object - cooling happens passively.

Now to make 3D printing filament, we have done the heating step 2x, so overall, we are 50% less energy efficient than injection molding.