Counterclaims

From Open Source Ecology
Revision as of 19:51, 20 July 2024 by Marcin (talk | contribs) (→‎Meta)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Type of language involved:

  • legal conclusion required therefore decline to answer
  • insufficient information in claim, thus deny
  • admit
  • deny
  • neither admit or deny
  • admit/deny in part - specify which parts
  • 'no response required' - because it's obvious - doesn't this violate rules of responding?
  • 'Defendants are without sufficient information to either admit or deny the

allegations contained in paragraph x, and therefore deny the same.'

Meta

  • General denial - throw it out of court on frivolous lawsuit allegation. FRCP Rule 8 [1]
  • Bullshit Responses - samples of legal perversion - [2]