FBA Programs Nomenclature

From Open Source Ecology
Revision as of 08:29, 20 January 2026 by Marcin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= First: Diagnose Why “Civilization Design (CD)” Is Breaking = Your instincts are correct. “Civilization Design” fails in three ways: * '''“Design” is culturally corrupted''' ** Implies aesthetics, UX, CAD, architecture-as-style ** Suggests low consequence, subjective output ** Attracts people optimized for slides, not systems * '''It undersignals rigor''' ** Does not clearly imply engineering discipline ** Does not imply accountability to reality ** Sound...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

First: Diagnose Why “Civilization Design (CD)” Is Breaking

Your instincts are correct. “Civilization Design” fails in three ways:

  • “Design” is culturally corrupted
    • Implies aesthetics, UX, CAD, architecture-as-style
    • Suggests low consequence, subjective output
    • Attracts people optimized for slides, not systems
  • It undersignals rigor
    • Does not clearly imply engineering discipline
    • Does not imply accountability to reality
    • Sounds adjacent to speculative futurism
  • It undersignals economic seriousness
    • Not obvious that outputs feed enterprise
    • Sounds “pre-business” rather than “proto-industry”
Retrieved from "https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=FBA_Programs_Nomenclature&oldid=318733"