Governance

From Open Source Ecology
Revision as of 15:43, 29 November 2012 by Marcin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sound governance is absolutely efficient production coupled with transparency. Note that the assumption here is that true freedom is based on material abundance - see talk from Bioneers East Conference for logic thread. Everyone is expected to contribute to an economy. People do things out of internal motivation. When internal motivation is aligned with responsibility - material abundance exist. This is a core message implicit in open source ecology. This is a rigorous condition of skill and wisdom. Factor e Farm is intended to be an experiment to show this. Question: what organizational model allows people to thrive under the conditions of a Development Center - if the project positioning is shifted away from a community to an organization?

Julia Valentine Comments

  • Should pay volunteers
  • Interns should pay for an education program.
  • Staff is paid, but that means for x by y.
  • Permanent people should be paid.
  • One model: not egalitarian, but pay for education.
  • Finance committee - should take $ out of my hands.

Fellowup Thoughts

  • Francois - A bit out of the box: Johan Roos - head of a business school in Sweden, close ties to LEGO and a background in agricultural science. Did an amazing LEGO serious play brainstorming session with us in China in August. Very high EQ. Has worked with all kinds of start-ups and giants...
  • Arthur - Is it possible to give people autonomy within very specific areas? "Functional authority" it's sometimes called. I.e. "do whatever you like as long as by Feb you have a prototype hyperdrive built."
  • KB - Helene would be perfect, but a little out of the way for her i think. Practically speaking i think you need to separate general trajectory and specific manufacturing sessions

Links