Sunday June 5 Notes

The product must be good. What is the most likely product can be excellent? The house is perhaps the number one winner and because it allows us to include all the different features that go into a house. That means that around the house which is a central product weekend include all the other technology development. The house must be a viable product. Performance goals are $10,000 per person two weeks of labor.

Within three years the goal is to achieve an open-source product development process which produces a product 10 times better cheaper and faster. We have already demonstrated 10 times faster and more or less 10 times cheaper now the question is better. By focusing on the construction site approach any product can be better. It can be modified as needed and as this design for a lifetime.

How does this appear in the world? First it's an option that has gone viral. Everyone on the planet understands that they can get a low cost home that they can build themselves. It will be a renaissance of people design their own houses.

Economically the fact will be to reduce the power of financial manipulation significantly as people gain control over the single largest expense in your life.

Politically this will mark an era of larger autonomy, where people have gained autonomy on one of their basic needs.

Ethically this will be a rebirth because people have mastered one of their needs.

On the open source project development methodology there's a key number of items that have never been put together Under One Roof to enable open collaboration on product development. For us the job is to figure out what these are and Implement them in a way that both individuals and companies can use them. The limit of this is local production microfactories and regenerative housing. The living environment integrates with the natural environment and a huge separation is no longer seen between the two. Just like indigenous people. We we inhabit the Earth 4 production the first open source material production facility demonstrates how local materials can be created anywhere for construction where construction now becomes a 0 polluter from its previous status as a super polluter IE the highest building sector on the planet. This works by recycling Plastics and let's talk about the personal life as far as throwing this model out.

A training program would focus on recruiting SMS, recruiting top candidates and producing Superior product while generating revenue from tuition and from actual builds. The commitment from the students is that of Lifestyle investment and that the students will do this for their work.

The support required for that is an HR position to keep everybody psychologically happy comma and a project manager just to follow up with all the project management tasks.

Within one year the pilot program has been created within 2 years we can have two cycles of students and within three years we can have four cycles of students. This means that we can try to double at every iteration. Maybe leave one cycle to do development or perhaps do one cycle of three six months take off for 3 months and then recruit again so maybe visible only to have one cycle of students per year from 2 students we could possibly go to 6 or 12 but the question would be where is the infrastructure.

This means some commitments development here. I'll be really interested making this a world-class Center and scaling it up to a thousand acres to produce the local economy?

The framework is that every student develops and publishes a sub Enterprise model like for example everyone learns how to build the housing butt a minor project is curious how to run another workshop on a different machine or a different product. This means that we develop a whole package of products that we can produce on demand with 3 Day scale preparation periods.

Operationally speaking how do we ensure this kind of growth if we assume that product sales and services are the bootstrap funding model. We teach so we gain the extra revenue of teaching but which is the part that allows for viral replication worldwide?

Operations

What is the sequencing confounding in this model? This needs to be determined carefully to determine how the hundred percent growth rates can occur every year. There would have to be a specific plan for facility management and workshops. As the executive with Catarina - our focus is continuing growth.

This is their revenue that allows for land acquisition, facility Construction, and management of the site? And how we beginning to diversify into other areas including regenerative agriculture biofuels energy Etc towards creating the integrated product build facility?

Within three years the goal would be to have the 11th a turnkey house build model and the three-day prep workshop model 4 the top five Enterprises that looks like the house tractor brake press torch table 3D printer car maybe that is run on a gasifier? That does make sense because for example the car or the tractor, tractor being the easiest to see comma is that we are creating a construction site so we can modify all the parts.

In this game the collaborative development part is the trick and the key question is how to enhance that to get to the 10 times faster cheaper and better. This was the slave that triangle of speed quality and cost or we actually achieve three of those at the same time and beat the s*** out of that model by using our Xtreme manufacturing techniques. We have nailed the manufacturing part. Now it's the development parts so how do we create a form little formidable effort at crowd contributions?

Definitely is that we have to define a language and without that language we are going nowhere because people will not be aligned so the point is to keep developing a few more parts just like we have with the modules Novi. We have seen that to work very well and maybe the concept of walls is very easy but the trick is how do you extend it to other utilities.

OSPD is key.

Can you think that has to happen is recruiting. The next thing that has to happen is project management. The next thing that has to happen is human resources. The next thing that has to happen is production meaning I'm going regular workshops.

Tactically how to get there? Do we do one thing at a time such as focus on one project at a time or do everything at once? It appears that the house allows this to happen with one product on everything - the single product includes just about everything. House also allows us to focus on the SMEs.

There are other things like legal piracy and modern-day Bandits, but the integrated approach appears to address most of that. Point being we can do at least as well as the average guy in a given sector Kama unless a complete Monopoly is found on it. That is the case for internet and Communications and psyops which means that we have to start getting the word out ourselves and we need to create internet and Communications infrastructure.

Operations Management

• How do we take certain products to the finish line?

Fist, we determine those products with lucid clarity. Is that the case? Yes, for the house as a specific item. It is a huge item, but the market is the largest out of any of the others. Second, we tap the secret sauce of Open Source. By recruiting subject matter experts from the critical areas of endeavor. Third, we develop effective OSPD. This is the three branches: faster, better, cheaper production. By a factor of 1000, 10 on each metric. The critical part is OSPD for the better element.

The standard way to address taking products to the finish line is proprietary development, but in our case we also document the open-source product.

The documentation part is currently lacking in terms of high quality. The critical W of SWOT here is being able to train people - how to train? By developing example templates. This is all in progress.

The most effective way to leverage our ability to create documentation is to recruit an expert who already does this well. Who does it well? That is the first question.

How do we define well? Meaning it takes them little time, and it is highly modular but it also fits a larger whole - so a requirement is a high level of coordination.

How is that coordination attained? It appears that part libraries and design guides are the most effective way.

It appears that the project that aligns itself and best for the design guide aspect is the 3D printer. One way to execute on that is to create a workshop where a person chooses the size of a 3D printer that they want to make.

• How do we run regular workshops?
• How do we run an education program?

OSPD

• How do we develop and do OSPD?

The critical part of OSPD is collaborative literacy - both in the sense that people are plain open, and 2, that they understand the dev process, and 3- that they understand how they fit in that process, and 4- that they understand the technical tools of operationalizing that process. 5- they are willing to commit one day per month - and understand the clear scope of an event, and how if they do not show up, the process is weakened. For which reason, teams work in pairs for backup - but they make a solid commitment to the process.

The team architecture involves a brief up front, before the event, and an SME brief as part of that. so when people join, they dive right in to work. the brief page has template. Product Infoboxes are used for the modules being developed.

The most effective way would be via design Sprints backed up by a rigorous development architecture. For Sprints to work, individuals have to commit to a basic level of performance: 1- understand the collaboration architecture; 2 - read the protocol of interest. 3- commit to collaborating with the others on the team via a work log and a commitment to easy-to-read documentation.

For Collaboration architecture to occur - 1- people have to understand Concurrent Engineering. 2-Tasks are committed to on a Scrumy. 3-time commitment is significant and it is 4-8 hr in one session. 5-people log in a work log. 6- documented takes all contributions and sets up a few/html wiki page with team etc, by using wiki Recent Changes. 7-Prerequisite is a Webinar and a checklist. 8-Prerequisite is a clear video with problem definition and revealing of all assets available - and a clear goal for that session. 9-celebration is a requirement. 9b- pre-event brief is required on top of general webinar. A 24 hr period is selected for the Sprint, so it works around the clock in tag team, and finishes with OSE International.

9c-120 peeps, for the design of 8 hours each - 1000 hours - and 120-fold compression or leverage ratio. But really, if a week is 40 hours, then this is 25 weeks - or about 6 months.

6 months of development is one day. If we develop this, then we beat the competition in terms of 100x more efficient development at least.

to say that 60-120 people have committed one quarter of labor into 1 day - that is simply the requirement. This means 5-10 project leaders were available. 10- project leaders, on 10 modules - 5 mechanical, 3 software, 2 electronics or such. 11- SME backing to expose due diligence of what actually works. 12-HR manager (unblocks on all levels, boots people off etc). 13- process manager makes sure Dev Boards are filled 14-html/CSS person fills out the Sprint Platform. 15- video documenter/storyteller does video and narrative. 16- everyone works, and is not distracted. 17-Data and video + comment + tweets feeds are in the background, and comments, FB, FB Live, Hangouts on Air, and others are used with easy existing tools. Concept, requirements, product Ecology, and working part library are found in a working document.

18- concept, calculations, technical design, CAD, CAM, 3DP, models, CAE, Structural Analysis, BOM, BOM optimization, explosion + assembly animation, validation cycle - parts count, cost, sourcing, checklist, Ecology checklist, integration validity, interface check, specification validation. Different calculation types. Calculation log. Improvement suggestions - such as import Substitution, alt materials, partial prototype, other material prototype, tech tree of choices. Advantages/disadvantages. Build time. Build waste. Common parts Substitution. Physics engine simulation. For example force of hit. Back of envelope calculations. Performance to cost analysis. Geometrical design. Do harness analysis. Approved mechanism. Approved library part. Scalability analysis. Ecology analysis - documenting various possible uses. Design Guide. Crowd funding element- posting assets in real-time, posting results in real-time, getting money in real-time to fund various development - we buy time for a person to recruit SMEs. Headhunter- one who tracks down experts, or suggests experts. Top priority - invite commits from those in the know. Bring people to the table - by recruiting services. Funding pays for build time and materials, only - ie, real product. Prototyping location - FeF as hea height product manager.

Perhaps the best approach would be to design for Scalability, modularity - just doing one Module, and applying it to various use cases.

Reward structure - those who commit material to spec (verified) - get 50% off our next workshop etc.

Blogger writes about this event, and publishes to our social media. OSEDev Twitter and OSE Workshops, and specific Forum. Mailing List.

• How do we document with writing, video, documentary, books, and instructionals?

Leveraging our ability here would mean that we work with authors to do a 50/50 of the revenue on books. For blogs, we collaborate. For video, we include that via OSPD protocol for remote video. Instructionals - we crowdsource through OSPD.

• How do we manage the facility?

Recruit an agriculture person armed with tractors. For waste, we recycle and make pellets, char pellets, plastic filament, poly tubing, polycarbonate glazing, pipe fittings, castings, wire, and etc. A materials production facility Enterprise.

• How do we secure extra land?

Revenue from workshops, etc. OSE is the standards org.

• How do we build infrastructure?

The approach must be integrated. Workshops that train and build infrastructure.