Cordless Drill Incentive Challenge Design

From Open Source Ecology
Revision as of 20:44, 18 January 2019 by Marcin (talk | contribs) (→‎Governance)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Working Questions

  • How do we design Quality Control into design challenges to produce the highest quality of design? This is a central question for distributed product development
  • Is anyone currently running a design challenge for distributive economic good on basic transcendance of Artificial Scarcity?
  • Can we design an incentive challenge that goes beyond design and into Public Production Engineering (PPE) for replicability by social entrepreneurs worldwide? The requirement for PPE is that building and testing of the technology must be included.

Rules

  • For admissibility, all designs must enter a public part libary on the OSE wiki. Files under 1M are stored on the wiki.
  • Entry must be complete, which forces participants to collaborate and network with one another.
  • Nobody gets the prize unless entry is complete. Completion is verified by build + pictures.
  • Dev Template of critical assets is posted on every wiki page as a template
  • Wiki Log- consists of template on top (critical assets), time sheet, and Work Log of progress.
  • Charger and drill must be enclosed and follow requirements of UL Certification and CE. Entrant must show how standards would be met.
  • Submission package must include:
  • Data - drill performance - number of holes through a softwood 2x4 on one charge
  • Code for charger with Arduino Mega or clone
  • Build Instructions - will be evaluated for completeness
  • BOM
  • CAD
  • Exploded part diagram
  • Tech drawings
  • UL/CE proof
  • Drill proper
  • $50 fee
  • Top 10 winners are invited to 2 Day Extreme Build Competition. Video edit is required by a team member.
  • Winner is selected on performance data and build time. Must use documented Admissible Parts and meet performance requirements.

Governance

  • Make the project so large that it is simply impossible without broad collaboration of at least 100 human years, allowing for 10% efficiency typical of peer development, so 10 human years of full time effort (about $1M value at $100k/pop)
  • Reward X for non-native FreeCAD CAD, 1.2 to 2 x for FreeCAD native format
  • Production Engineering is included in settings and platform layout; nesting is considered for production optimization
  • Bonus for self-packaging-print parts kit on the production engineering side?
  • Produced on OSHWA-certified hardware for non-ambiguity