Sensorica
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Critique
- This has great potential, however, the concept would benefit from using open source, OSHWA and OSI compliant licenses. Open source licenses were created to address the attribution issue: voluntary attribution, without contribution-accounting overhead.
- Value acconting must be evaluated for each project. This imposes significant overhead to any project, and consitutes to Collaborative Waste. This is a problem resolved by choosing open source licenses.
- Value accounting is a fundamental problem that is addressed via exchange relationships: ie, value is negotiated prior to any exchange. Value cannot be determined a priori. Thus, emphasis on an a-priori value accounting system is a fundamnetal impossibility, and fair exchange of value is not possible.
- System is based on innovation of corporate form. That is good. But OVN is not the only way to a non-hierarchical system. Free enterprise (free as in freedom, ethical, and inclusive of humans and nature)
- OVN is fundamentally exclusive. Without open licensing, it creates 'outsiders' - those who do not join the network. This form of coercion is avoided in permissive open source licenses such as MIT License or CC-BY, and is partly avoided in non-permissive open source licenses such as GPL or CC-BY-SA.
- OVN accounting system - what is the formula? Can it be gamed? How much effort does it take? How is it adapted to each new project?
- Platform for production/distribution - this should follow the creation of the OVN, not precede it. It needs to be built out based on reality, not theory.