Compressed Air Storage Calculations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Calculations for a 1kWhr System
- From Compressed Air Energy Storage results, it takes 170 cubic meters of air to deliver 1kWhr of usable stored energy.
Calculator
See https://www.tribology-abc.com/abc/thermodynamics.htm
According to the calculator, a 50 l tank of air at 3000 psi will release about 0.5kWhr via adiabatic expansion, and 2.5x this with isothermal expansion.
Rough Calculations
- Air tools require 30 cfm for 1 hp [1]
- A 300 cuf tank thus gives 10 minutes, about, of 1 hp power. With radial piston motor - at 10-20 the efficiency, easily gives 1 hp hr. Let's get specifics.
- 6 cylinders would thus give 1 hp hr. Not great, but we can get much better efficiencies from a better air engine.
Air Engine
- Rotary air engine - [2]
- 0,75 hp $200 30 cfm [3]
- Rotary vane, 1.8 hp $200 [4]
- Radial Piston Motor - 20x more efficient at full load than rotary! [5]
- Radial vs axial piston motors - [6]
- Data curve - 25 cu ft/min for 0.8 hp at 100 psi [7]. Thus, 12 minutes on 1 tank of 300 cu ft. Get 5 tanks for 1 hp hr, at cost of $1500. The good part is that the metal tanks will last for ever.
Cylinder Sourcing
- Firefighter supply - 300 cf $300 [8]
- 250 cf - $285 [9]
- 250 cf = $330 [10] K size?
- T-size 300 cf - [11]
- T goes up to 390 cf - [12]
Compressor
- Scuba compressor - $243, 1800W - [13]
Technical
- Compressed Air Index - [14]
- Energy stored in a cubic meter of volume at 70 bar is 6.3 kWhr. [15]. Compare to 300 cu ft - which correcponds to 42l volume inside - 0.04 cu meter - but equiv to 0.1 of the above if done at 200 bar - then energy stored in the gas cylinder is 0.6 kWhr. And before, we said we have 12 minutes of 0.75 kW. Yes, figures match assuming around 20% efficiency of air motor.
3D Printed
- Diaphragm air-tight engine seems to work reasonably well [16]
- Tech used: diaphragm and bump valve without spring. Diaphragm acts as spring.
- 5x bigger version - [17]
Efficiencies
- Piston engine - 13% at 5 bar [18]
- 50 Whr/l at 300 bar [19]
- This with 50 kwHr/cubic meter. Does not match 6.4 kwhr at 70 bar [20]? Possibly, though simple multiplication yields 25 kWhr/cu m.