Doomer Optimism

From Open Source Ecology
Revision as of 22:30, 4 March 2026 by Marcin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Next event - https://luma.com/jkrbsh4r Bottom line, can the Doomer Optimism movement be assessed as civilization grade development work related to Open Source Ecology? *Their strategy appears to be withdrawal rather than redesign. Doomer Optimism sits between collapse acceptance and small-scale reconstruction. *OSE believes , in turn, that Civilization-scale productivity should be achievable with open, modular, distributable industrial systems.")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Next event - https://luma.com/jkrbsh4r

Bottom line, can the Doomer Optimism movement be assessed as civilization grade development work related to Open Source Ecology?

  • Their strategy appears to be withdrawal rather than redesign. Doomer Optimism sits between collapse acceptance and small-scale reconstruction.
  • OSE believes , in turn, that Civilization-scale productivity should be achievable with open, modular, distributable industrial systems.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Doomer_Optimism&oldid=320778"