Critique of Liberalism

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to: navigation, search

Liberal societies, Fukuyama admits, can be excessively consumerist, permissive, tolerant of inequality, dominated by political and cultural elites, and slow to respond to the needs and demands of citizens. [1]

Solutions proposed:

  • Fukuyama - First, to promote a sense of national identity not focused on “fixed characteristics” such as race or faith but on patriotism and love for a liberal, open society of which citizens, whatever their politics, should be justly proud. Next - Next, he urges moderation in our politics, both from classical liberals such as himself and from the discontented. OSE Perspective - note that the above 2 points come from a scarcity mindset of limits. OSE tends more towards an abolutely creative approach for problem-solving. That is - we must start at the economy - where poor economic performance is underscored as a cause in this article. See also, for example, What Russians Really Want as a 4-person data point. The qeustion of the economy comes up over and over. Human frailty is certainly an issue, but we cannot start to problemsolve democracy by starting at sociology - we must start at the economy. OSE maintains that the economy is fundamental and must be addressed first. Politics and sociology follows. Hence the OSE mission of collaborative design for a transparent and inclusive economy of abundance - as a starting point.

Thus, Fukuyama's proposal doesn't appear to get us far - 'calm down, love each other, and things will be all right?' Come on.

Let's pass each of the issues through a solution filter instead:

  • excessively consumerist - OSE promotes distribution of productive power for mutually assured abundance - focusing on regenerative development, not consumerism.
  • permissive - OSE's Radical Man appraoch states live and let live, and bridge the distance, by risking yourself.
  • tolerant of inequality - Distributive Enterprise is designed to address exactly this point
  • dominated by political and cultural elites - we see the shortcomings of the The Best and the Brightest in addition to the apparent positives. The gap is integrated education where people see things more holistically
  • slow to respond to the needs and demands of citizens - OSE promotes max agency for Self-Determination - personally and politically.