People don't like the cost of using more energy. Obvious solution is clean, renewable energy to produce 100x more, or about the equivalent of $5M personal value creation per every person on earth (100x the Affluence with 100x Less Environmental Impact)
The article above completely ignores the mental model of Kardashev Scale. Civilizationcurrently uses 1/10000 of the available solar power. From first principles, and from simplicity perspective - the preferred solution should therefore be solar, not nuclear. This is basics of numeracy. Unless we think that 100x (conservative limit based on 1% of available solar energy) higher energy use per capita is insufficient. Am I wrong?
the solution is solar. Fusion should remain 93M miles away.