How to Respond to a Counterclaim
From Open Source Ecology
Howto
- Get a copy of the claim
- Examime the counts of the claim
- Respond to each point in the claim. Include Affirmative Defenses.
- Agree or deny, agree in part, neither agree nor disagree if you have not enough info [1]
- What about if the claim is vague?
- If it is not clear what is being asked, ask.
- Watch out for trickery:
- Vague claims that elicit voluntary information that abets the opposition's case
- Intentionally misleading claims which trap one to admit something that is not relevant but supports the opposition's case
- Absence of any evidence, where opposition is seeking for you to incriminate yourself by things inadvertently said and distored
- Manipulation of words or distortion which aims to produce fault if not rebutted correctly
- Using technical terms or words with double meanings with aim to mislead
Responses
- Admit or deny
- Ask for further information, clarification, specificity
- Request further information or evidence for you to accept or deny the claim
- Don't accept or deny, leave up for the court.
Strategies
- Produce evidence for outright denial, and motion for summary judgment with legal basis, with supporting affidavits (74.04). Motion for summary judgment may include the issue of liability alone.
- Determine clear uncontroversial vs in-good-faith disputed facts
Defenses
- Types of defenses: Defense is a general term that includes perfect and imperfect defenses, affirmative and negative defenses, justifications and excuses, and procedural defenses. [2]
- Affirmative defenses - These are more general defenses, outside of accept and deny (outside of negating defences. [3]
- Failure to state a claim - is a defense asserting that even if all the factual allegations in a complaint are true, they are insufficient to establish a cause of action and the case should therefore be dismissed.
Sample Responses
Terms